[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/7] s390x: refactor error handling for CSCH
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/7] s390x: refactor error handling for CSCH handler |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:11:21 +0200 |
On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 14:14:45 +0800
Dong Jia Shi <address@hidden> wrote:
> * Halil Pasic <address@hidden> [2017-10-17 16:04:51 +0200]:
>
> > Simplify the error handling of the cSCH. Let the code detecting the
> > condition tell (in a less ambiguous way) how it's to be handled. No
> > changes in behavior.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <address@hidden>
> > ---
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/target/s390x/ioinst.c b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
> > index 4ad07e9181..fd659e77a5 100644
> > --- a/target/s390x/ioinst.c
> > +++ b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
> > @@ -60,8 +60,6 @@ void ioinst_handle_csch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1)
> > {
> > int cssid, ssid, schid, m;
> > SubchDev *sch;
> > - int ret = -ENODEV;
> > - int cc;
> >
> > if (ioinst_disassemble_sch_ident(reg1, &m, &cssid, &ssid, &schid)) {
> > program_interrupt(&cpu->env, PGM_OPERAND, 4);
> > @@ -69,15 +67,11 @@ void ioinst_handle_csch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1)
> > }
> > trace_ioinst_sch_id("csch", cssid, ssid, schid);
> > sch = css_find_subch(m, cssid, ssid, schid);
> > - if (sch && css_subch_visible(sch)) {
> > - ret = css_do_csch(sch);
> > - }
> > - if (ret == -ENODEV) {
> > - cc = 3;
> > - } else {
> > - cc = 0;
> > + if (!sch || !css_subch_visible(sch)) {
> > + setcc(cpu, 3);
> Same question here.
>
> > + return;
> > }
> > - setcc(cpu, cc);
> > + setcc(cpu, css_do_csch(sch));
> > }
> >
> > void ioinst_handle_hsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1)
> > --
> > 2.13.5
> >
>
> If we agree to replace 3 with IOINST_CC_NOT_OPERATIONAL, maybe Conny
> could fix it. Or we can do that in a following cleanup patch?
Switching it to IOINST_CC_NOT_OPERATIONAL is certainly good, but I
think I've already done enough editing for this series...
A patch on top would be the best way.
>
> W/ or w/o the fix, for now:
> Reviewed-by: Dong Jia Shi <address@hidden>
>