qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/8] target/mips: Workaround for checkpatch.p


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/8] target/mips: Workaround for checkpatch.pl hanging on msa_helper.c
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 13:52:14 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0

Hi Aleksandar,

On 07/06/2018 12:38 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> Hi, Paolo,
> 
> It was an incredibly fast fix! :)
> 
> I already confirmed that the fix fixes the problem on msa_helper.c. I would 
> nevertheless like to have this workaround applied. Can you perhaps give it 
> "Reviewed-by"?
> 
> Regards,
> Aleksandar
> 
> 
>> Subject: [PATCH v4 2/8] target/mips: Workaround for checkpatch.pl hanging on 
>> > msa_helper.c
>>
>> From: Aleksandar Markovic <address@hidden>
>>
>> If checkpatch.pl is applied (using switch "-f") on file
>> target/mips/msa_helper.c, it will hang.
>>
>> This is a workaround by correcting the source file. The workaround is
>> found by partial deleting and undeleting of the code in msa_helper.c
>> in binary search fashion.
>>
>> The bug (for checkpatch.pl) is already reported to the qemu-devel list.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aleksandar Markovic <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  target/mips/msa_helper.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/mips/msa_helper.c b/target/mips/msa_helper.c
>> index c74e3cd..1691b70 100644
>> --- a/target/mips/msa_helper.c
>> +++ b/target/mips/msa_helper.c
>> @@ -2750,8 +2750,8 @@ void helper_msa_ftq_df(CPUMIPSState *env, uint32_t df, 
>> > uint32_t wd,
>>
>>  #define FMAXMIN_A(F, G, X, _S, _T, BITS, STATUS)                    \
>>      do {                                                            \
>> -        uint## BITS ##_t S = _S, T = _T;                            \
>> -        uint## BITS ##_t as, at, xs, xt, xd;                        \
>> +        uint## BITS ## _t S = _S, T = _T;                           \
>> +        uint## BITS ## _t as, at, xs, xt, xd;                       \

I'm not sure it's worth having this but you are the maintainer so your
choice :) What is unclear to me is, while changing this, why only fix
the suffix and not also the prefix? That is:

            uint<space>## BITS ##<space>_t S = _S, T = _T;

>>          if (NUMBER_QNAN_PAIR(S, T, BITS, STATUS)) {                 \
>>              T = S;                                                  \
>>          }                                                           \
>> --
>> 2.7.4



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]