[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH hack dontapply v2 7/7] pc: HACK: acpi: tie in _C
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH hack dontapply v2 7/7] pc: HACK: acpi: tie in _CST object to Processor |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:02:06 +0200 |
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:49:57 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 04:49:08PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:50:09 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 02:37:24PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 03:01:34 +0300
> > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Based on patch by Igor Mammedov.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a hack: we definitely shouldn't do it
> > > > > unconditionally, and initialization should be handled
> > > > > differently (through an isa device?). io port to use
> > > > > should depend on the PC type and should be documented.
> > > > >
> > > > > Notifications should be supported.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > include/hw/i386/pc.h | 5 +++++
> > > > > hw/acpi/cpu.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 10 +++++++++-
> > > > > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/include/hw/i386/pc.h b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > > > > index 316230e570..83b3a84322 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,11 @@
> > > > >
> > > > > #define HPET_INTCAP "hpet-intcap"
> > > > >
> > > > > +typedef struct PCCstate {
> > > > > + uint32_t latency;
> > > > > + uint32_t hint;
> > > > > +} PCCstate;
> > > > > +
> > > > > /**
> > > > > * PCMachineState:
> > > > > * @acpi_dev: link to ACPI PM device that performs ACPI hotplug
> > > > > handling
> > > > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/cpu.c b/hw/acpi/cpu.c
> > > > > index 5ae595ecbe..e9e207b033 100644
> > > > > --- a/hw/acpi/cpu.c
> > > > > +++ b/hw/acpi/cpu.c
> > > > > @@ -561,6 +561,11 @@ void build_cpus_aml(Aml *table, MachineState
> > > > > *machine, CPUHotplugFeatures opts,
> > > > >
> > > > > aml_int(arch_ids->cpus[i].props.node_id)));
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > + if (1) {
> > > > > + method = aml_method("_CST", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> > > > > + aml_append(method, aml_return(aml_call0("CCST")));
> > > > >
> > > > in case of not loaded CCST it would be unresolved reference.
> > > > It would be better to have a package /SB.CPUS.CCST filled with some
> > > > startup values
> > > > and than that could be updated on the fly with new package.
> > >
> > > I think it will conflict if we do. But yes we could load \SB.CCST and
> > > then \SB.CPUS.CCST will override that. Would it help though?
> > > ACPI spec does not describe what happens on load failure.
> > > For linux it does not matter much -
> > > it just handles the error. What happens on windows with an unresolved
> > > reference? Is failure to load the object any better?
> > I was thinking more in a align of assigning a new temporary package value to
> > a statically named CCST:
> >
> > update_cst_METHOD()
> > build package in local0
> > \SB.CPUS.CCST = local0
> >
> > so guest gets valid initial CCST with values on source host at boot time
> > and on target values are replaced on update.
> >
> > It doesn't have to be named variable/could be a method but with always
> > valid values.
>
> Right but what are we trying to achieve here?
have a valid package not only on update but on boot up as well
>
> > >
> > > > > + aml_append(dev, method);
> > > > > + }
> > > > > aml_append(cpus_dev, dev);
> > > > > }
> > > > > }
> > > > > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > > > index fff1059a31..da2c830db7 100644
> > > > > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > > > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > > > @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@
> > > > > #include "hw/i386/intel_iommu.h"
> > > > >
> > > > > #include "hw/acpi/ipmi.h"
> > > > > +#include "hw/acpi/cst.h"
> > > > >
> > > > > /* These are used to size the ACPI tables for -M pc-i440fx-1.7 and
> > > > > * -M pc-i440fx-2.0. Even if the actual amount of AML generated
> > > > > grows
> > > > > @@ -1840,7 +1841,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker
> > > > > *linker,
> > > > > build_legacy_cpu_hotplug_aml(dsdt, machine,
> > > > > pm->cpu_hp_io_base);
> > > > > } else {
> > > > > CPUHotplugFeatures opts = {
> > > > > - .apci_1_compatible = true, .has_legacy_cphp = true
> > > > > + .apci_1_compatible = true, .has_legacy_cphp = true,
> > > > unrelated change???
> > >
> > > Good catch.
> > >
> > > > > };
> > > > > build_cpus_aml(dsdt, machine, opts, pm->cpu_hp_io_base,
> > > > > "\\_SB.PCI0", "\\_GPE._E02");
> > > > > @@ -2693,6 +2694,10 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables,
> > > > > MachineState *machine)
> > > > > tables->vmgenid, tables->linker);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > + /* TODO: get a free ioport. This one is PIIX specific. */
> > > > > + acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
> > > > > + cst_build_acpi(tables_blob, tables->linker, 0xaf20);
> > > > > +
> > > > > if (misc.has_hpet) {
> > > > > acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
> > > > > build_hpet(tables_blob, tables->linker);
> > > > > @@ -2891,6 +2896,9 @@ void acpi_setup(void)
> > > > >
> > > > > build_state = g_malloc0(sizeof *build_state);
> > > > >
> > > > > + /* TODO: this is not the best place to do it */
> > > > > + cst_register(pcms->fw_cfg, 0xaf20);
> > > > > +
> > > > > acpi_build_tables_init(&tables);
> > > > > acpi_build(&tables, MACHINE(pcms));
> > > > >
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH hack dontapply v2 6/7] acpi: aml generation for _CST, (continued)
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH hack dontapply v2 7/7] pc: HACK: acpi: tie in _CST object to Processor, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/07/09
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH hack dontapply v2 2/7] acpi: generalize aml_package / aml_varpackage, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/07/09
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH hack dontapply v2 0/7] Dynamic _CST generation, no-reply, 2018/07/09
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH hack dontapply v2 8/7 untested] acpi: support cst change notifications, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2018/07/09
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH hack dontapply v2 0/7] Dynamic _CST generation, Igor Mammedov, 2018/07/25