[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] vfio-pci: Introduce vfio_set_event_handl
From: |
Alex Williamson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] vfio-pci: Introduce vfio_set_event_handler helper |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:51:34 -0700 |
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 22:06:31 +0100
Eric Auger <address@hidden> wrote:
> The code used to attach the eventfd handler for the ERR and
> REQ irq indices can be factorized into a helper. In subsequent
> patches we will extend this helper to support other irq indices.
>
> We test whether the notification is allowed outside of the helper:
> respectively check vdev->pci_aer and VFIO_FEATURE_ENABLE_REQ.
> Depending on the returned value we set vdev->pci_aer and
> vdev->req_enabled. An error handle is introduced for future usage
> although not strictly useful here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <address@hidden>
>
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - s/vfio_register_event_notifier/vfio_set_event_handler
> - turned into a void function
> - do the qemu_set_fd_handler(*pfd, NULL, NULL, vdev) and
> event_notifier_cleanup on VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQS failure
> as reported by Alexey
> - reset err in vfio_realize as reported by Cornelia
> - Text/comment fixes suggested by Cornelia
> ---
> hw/vfio/pci.c | 296 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 132 insertions(+), 164 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> index c0cb1ec289..3cae4c99ef 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> @@ -105,6 +105,96 @@ static void vfio_intx_eoi(VFIODevice *vbasedev)
> vfio_unmask_single_irqindex(vbasedev, VFIO_PCI_INTX_IRQ_INDEX);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * vfio_set_event_handler - setup/tear down eventfd
> + * notification and handling for IRQ indices that span over
> + * a single IRQ
> + *
> + * @vdev: VFIO device handle
> + * @index: IRQ index the eventfd/handler is associated with
> + * @enable: true means notifier chain needs to be set up
> + * @handler: handler to attach if @enable is true
Therefore @enable is redundant.
> + * @errp: error handle
> + */
> +static void vfio_set_event_handler(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev,
> + int index,
> + bool enable,
> + void (*handler)(void *opaque),
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + struct vfio_irq_info irq_info = { .argsz = sizeof(irq_info),
> + .index = index };
> + struct vfio_irq_set *irq_set;
> + EventNotifier *notifier;
> + int argsz, ret = 0;
> + int32_t *pfd, fd;
> +
> + switch (index) {
> + case VFIO_PCI_REQ_IRQ_INDEX:
> + notifier = &vdev->req_notifier;
> + break;
> + case VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX:
> + notifier = &vdev->err_notifier;
> + break;
This blows the abstraction of a helper that this seems to be trying to
create, seems cleaner to pass @notifier.
> + default:
> + g_assert_not_reached();
> + }
> +
> + if (ioctl(vdev->vbasedev.fd,
> + VFIO_DEVICE_GET_IRQ_INFO, &irq_info) < 0 || irq_info.count <
> 1) {
> + error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "No irq index %d available", index);
> + return;
The implicit count, aka sub-index, is also problematic for the
abstraction. Can we tackle applying this to MSI/X to validate if this
needs to go another step to allow the caller to specify index and
sub-index?
> + }
> +
> + if (enable) {
> + ret = event_notifier_init(notifier, 0);
> + if (ret) {
> + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
> + "Unable to init event notifier for irq index
> %d",
> + index);
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + argsz = sizeof(*irq_set) + sizeof(*pfd);
> +
> + irq_set = g_malloc0(argsz);
> + irq_set->argsz = argsz;
> + irq_set->flags = VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_EVENTFD |
> + VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER;
> + irq_set->index = index;
> + irq_set->start = 0;
> + irq_set->count = 1;
> + pfd = (int32_t *)&irq_set->data;
> +
> + if (!notifier) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Notifier not initialized for irq index %d", index);
> + return;
> + }
What is this supposed to check? @notifier is not NULL initialized, the
case statement will assert if it doesn't get set, and this doesn't
actually test if it's properly initialized.
> +
> + fd = event_notifier_get_fd(notifier);
> +
> + if (enable) {
> + qemu_set_fd_handler(fd, handler, NULL, vdev);
> + *pfd = fd;
> + } else {
> + *pfd = -1;
> + }
> +
> + ret = ioctl(vdev->vbasedev.fd, VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQS, irq_set);
> + g_free(irq_set);
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
> + "Failed to %s eventfd signalling for index %d",
> + enable ? "set up" : "tear down", index);
> + }
> + if (ret || !enable) {
> + qemu_set_fd_handler(fd, NULL, NULL, vdev);
> + event_notifier_cleanup(notifier);
> + }
> +}
Suggest passing @notifier as a parameter and using @handler in place of
@enable, more generic and more obvious calling convention.
> +
> static void vfio_intx_enable_kvm(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM
> @@ -2621,86 +2711,6 @@ static void vfio_err_notifier_handler(void *opaque)
> vm_stop(RUN_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Registers error notifier for devices supporting error recovery.
> - * If we encounter a failure in this function, we report an error
> - * and continue after disabling error recovery support for the
> - * device.
> - */
> -static void vfio_register_err_notifier(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> -{
> - int ret;
> - int argsz;
> - struct vfio_irq_set *irq_set;
> - int32_t *pfd;
> -
> - if (!vdev->pci_aer) {
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - if (event_notifier_init(&vdev->err_notifier, 0)) {
> - error_report("vfio: Unable to init event notifier for error
> detection");
> - vdev->pci_aer = false;
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - argsz = sizeof(*irq_set) + sizeof(*pfd);
> -
> - irq_set = g_malloc0(argsz);
> - irq_set->argsz = argsz;
> - irq_set->flags = VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_EVENTFD |
> - VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER;
> - irq_set->index = VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX;
> - irq_set->start = 0;
> - irq_set->count = 1;
> - pfd = (int32_t *)&irq_set->data;
> -
> - *pfd = event_notifier_get_fd(&vdev->err_notifier);
> - qemu_set_fd_handler(*pfd, vfio_err_notifier_handler, NULL, vdev);
> -
> - ret = ioctl(vdev->vbasedev.fd, VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQS, irq_set);
> - if (ret) {
> - error_report("vfio: Failed to set up error notification");
> - qemu_set_fd_handler(*pfd, NULL, NULL, vdev);
> - event_notifier_cleanup(&vdev->err_notifier);
> - vdev->pci_aer = false;
> - }
> - g_free(irq_set);
> -}
> -
> -static void vfio_unregister_err_notifier(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> -{
> - int argsz;
> - struct vfio_irq_set *irq_set;
> - int32_t *pfd;
> - int ret;
> -
> - if (!vdev->pci_aer) {
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - argsz = sizeof(*irq_set) + sizeof(*pfd);
> -
> - irq_set = g_malloc0(argsz);
> - irq_set->argsz = argsz;
> - irq_set->flags = VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_EVENTFD |
> - VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER;
> - irq_set->index = VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX;
> - irq_set->start = 0;
> - irq_set->count = 1;
> - pfd = (int32_t *)&irq_set->data;
> - *pfd = -1;
> -
> - ret = ioctl(vdev->vbasedev.fd, VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQS, irq_set);
> - if (ret) {
> - error_report("vfio: Failed to de-assign error fd: %m");
> - }
> - g_free(irq_set);
> - qemu_set_fd_handler(event_notifier_get_fd(&vdev->err_notifier),
> - NULL, NULL, vdev);
> - event_notifier_cleanup(&vdev->err_notifier);
> -}
> -
> static void vfio_req_notifier_handler(void *opaque)
> {
> VFIOPCIDevice *vdev = opaque;
> @@ -2716,86 +2726,6 @@ static void vfio_req_notifier_handler(void *opaque)
> }
> }
>
> -static void vfio_register_req_notifier(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> -{
> - struct vfio_irq_info irq_info = { .argsz = sizeof(irq_info),
> - .index = VFIO_PCI_REQ_IRQ_INDEX };
> - int argsz;
> - struct vfio_irq_set *irq_set;
> - int32_t *pfd;
> -
> - if (!(vdev->features & VFIO_FEATURE_ENABLE_REQ)) {
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - if (ioctl(vdev->vbasedev.fd,
> - VFIO_DEVICE_GET_IRQ_INFO, &irq_info) < 0 || irq_info.count <
> 1) {
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - if (event_notifier_init(&vdev->req_notifier, 0)) {
> - error_report("vfio: Unable to init event notifier for device
> request");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - argsz = sizeof(*irq_set) + sizeof(*pfd);
> -
> - irq_set = g_malloc0(argsz);
> - irq_set->argsz = argsz;
> - irq_set->flags = VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_EVENTFD |
> - VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER;
> - irq_set->index = VFIO_PCI_REQ_IRQ_INDEX;
> - irq_set->start = 0;
> - irq_set->count = 1;
> - pfd = (int32_t *)&irq_set->data;
> -
> - *pfd = event_notifier_get_fd(&vdev->req_notifier);
> - qemu_set_fd_handler(*pfd, vfio_req_notifier_handler, NULL, vdev);
> -
> - if (ioctl(vdev->vbasedev.fd, VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQS, irq_set)) {
> - error_report("vfio: Failed to set up device request notification");
> - qemu_set_fd_handler(*pfd, NULL, NULL, vdev);
> - event_notifier_cleanup(&vdev->req_notifier);
> - } else {
> - vdev->req_enabled = true;
> - }
> -
> - g_free(irq_set);
> -}
> -
> -static void vfio_unregister_req_notifier(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> -{
> - int argsz;
> - struct vfio_irq_set *irq_set;
> - int32_t *pfd;
> -
> - if (!vdev->req_enabled) {
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - argsz = sizeof(*irq_set) + sizeof(*pfd);
> -
> - irq_set = g_malloc0(argsz);
> - irq_set->argsz = argsz;
> - irq_set->flags = VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_EVENTFD |
> - VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER;
> - irq_set->index = VFIO_PCI_REQ_IRQ_INDEX;
> - irq_set->start = 0;
> - irq_set->count = 1;
> - pfd = (int32_t *)&irq_set->data;
> - *pfd = -1;
> -
> - if (ioctl(vdev->vbasedev.fd, VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQS, irq_set)) {
> - error_report("vfio: Failed to de-assign device request fd: %m");
> - }
> - g_free(irq_set);
> - qemu_set_fd_handler(event_notifier_get_fd(&vdev->req_notifier),
> - NULL, NULL, vdev);
> - event_notifier_cleanup(&vdev->req_notifier);
> -
> - vdev->req_enabled = false;
> -}
> -
> static void vfio_realize(PCIDevice *pdev, Error **errp)
> {
> VFIOPCIDevice *vdev = PCI_VFIO(pdev);
> @@ -3069,8 +2999,33 @@ static void vfio_realize(PCIDevice *pdev, Error **errp)
> goto out_teardown;
> }
>
> - vfio_register_err_notifier(vdev);
> - vfio_register_req_notifier(vdev);
> + if (vdev->pci_aer) {
> + Error *err = NULL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Registers error notifier for devices supporting error recovery.
> + * If we encounter a failure during registration, we report an error
> + * and continue after disabling error recovery support for the
> + * device.
> + */
> + vfio_set_event_handler(vdev, VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX, true,
> + vfio_err_notifier_handler, &err);
> + if (err) {
> + warn_reportf_err(err, VFIO_MSG_PREFIX, vdev->vbasedev.name);
> + }
Why not just return -1 on error and zero on success so we can call as:
if (vfio_set_event_handler(...)) {
warn_reportf_err()...
}
> + vdev->pci_aer = !err;
We could also avoid this weirdness of this negation to get a bool.
> + }
It's not obvious how doing away with the register/unregister helpers
and doing everything inline is an improvement. Simple helpers calling
common helpers seems better than inline sprawl calling common helpers.
Thanks,
Alex
> +
> + if (vdev->features & VFIO_FEATURE_ENABLE_REQ) {
> + Error *err = NULL;
> +
> + vfio_set_event_handler(vdev, VFIO_PCI_REQ_IRQ_INDEX, true,
> + vfio_req_notifier_handler, &err);
> + if (err) {
> + warn_reportf_err(err, VFIO_MSG_PREFIX, vdev->vbasedev.name);
> + }
> + vdev->req_enabled = !err;
> + }
> vfio_setup_resetfn_quirk(vdev);
>
> return;
> @@ -3106,9 +3061,22 @@ static void vfio_instance_finalize(Object *obj)
> static void vfio_exitfn(PCIDevice *pdev)
> {
> VFIOPCIDevice *vdev = PCI_VFIO(pdev);
> + Error *err = NULL;
>
> - vfio_unregister_req_notifier(vdev);
> - vfio_unregister_err_notifier(vdev);
> + if (vdev->req_enabled) {
> + vfio_set_event_handler(vdev, VFIO_PCI_REQ_IRQ_INDEX,
> + false, NULL, &err);
> + if (err) {
> + warn_reportf_err(err, VFIO_MSG_PREFIX, vdev->vbasedev.name);
> + }
> + }
> + if (vdev->pci_aer) {
> + vfio_set_event_handler(vdev, VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX,
> + false, NULL, &err);
> + if (err) {
> + warn_reportf_err(err, VFIO_MSG_PREFIX, vdev->vbasedev.name);
> + }
> + }
> pci_device_set_intx_routing_notifier(&vdev->pdev, NULL);
> vfio_disable_interrupts(vdev);
> if (vdev->intx.mmap_timer) {