Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/12] EDK2 Firmware roms

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

Le mer. 20 mars 2019 21:05, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> a
écrit :

> Le mer. 20 mars 2019 20:43, Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden> a écrit :
>
>> On 03/20/19 19:59, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> > (+Daniel and MST)
>> >
>> > On 03/20/19 16:58, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> >> A question: does this absolutely have to be 'xz' and not bzip ?
>> >
>> > I think bzip2 should work fine too:
>> >
>> >   1146804 edk2-aarch64-code.fd.xz       | 1177603
>> edk2-aarch64-code.fd.bz2
>> >   1147852 edk2-arm-code.fd.xz           | 1173662 edk2-arm-code.fd.bz2
>> >     10008 edk2-arm-vars.fd.xz           |     263 edk2-arm-vars.fd.bz2
>> >   1674764 edk2-i386-code.fd.xz          | 1688659 edk2-i386-code.fd.bz2
>> >   1870024 edk2-i386-secure-code.fd.xz   | 1881979
>> edk2-i386-secure-code.fd.bz2
>> >       320 edk2-i386-vars.fd.xz          |     190 edk2-i386-vars.fd.bz2
>> >   1655276 edk2-x86_64-code.fd.xz        | 1669280
>> edk2-x86_64-code.fd.bz2
>> >   1889024 edk2-x86_64-secure-code.fd.xz | 1901210
>> edk2-x86_64-secure-code.fd.bz2
>> >   9394072 total                         | 9492846 total
>> >
>> > ~1% size increase in total.
>> >
>> > If we switch to bzip2, should I hurry for 4.0, or take my time in the
>> next development cycle?
>>
>> An alternative to rebasing / reworking the series in-place (for
>> xz-->bz2) and to missing the 4.0 bus consequently, would be to merge the
>> PULL req as is, and for me to submit an incremental update, for the
>> xz-->bz2 replacement. I think that would qualify as a bugfix, and be
>> eligible for the hard freeze too.
>>
>
> A simple fix could be ./configure checks for xz and if not installed
> kindly ask for installation, or as a warning then if unable to install
> (user without root access) simply doesn't uncompress.
>

./configure detect no xz and select --disable-blobs?


>> Thanks
>> Laszlo
>>
>>