qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 4.1 v2 08/13] tests: acpi: add a way to star


From: Laszlo Ersek
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 4.1 v2 08/13] tests: acpi: add a way to start tests with UEFI firmware
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:16:57 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1

On 03/26/19 14:09, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> For testcase to use UEFI firmware, one needs to provide and specify
> firmwarei and varstore blobs names in test_data { uefi_fl1, uefi_fl2) }
> fields respectively and RAM start address plus size where to look for
> test structure signature. Additionally testcase should specify
> bootable cdrom image uefi-boot-images EFI test utility.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> ---
> v3:
>   * drop data_dir prefix and firmware will come from pc-bios directly
>   * add cdrom option so test could use it for providing boot cdrom image
> v2:
>   * move RAM start address and size to test_data, as it could differ
>     between boards (and even versions)
> ---
>  tests/bios-tables-test.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> index 53d4379..91846d6 100644
> --- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> +++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@
>  typedef struct {
>      const char *machine;
>      const char *variant;
> +    const char *uefi_fl1;
> +    const char *uefi_fl2;
> +    const char *cd;
> +    const uint64_t ram_start;
> +    const uint64_t scan_len;
>      uint64_t rsdp_addr;
>      uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */];
>      GArray *tables;
> @@ -522,21 +527,36 @@ static void test_smbios_structs(test_data *data)
>  static void test_acpi_one(const char *params, test_data *data)
>  {
>      char *args;
> -
> -    /* Disable kernel irqchip to be able to override apic irq0. */
> -    args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s,accel=%s,kernel-irqchip=off "
> -                           "-net none -display none %s "
> -                           "-drive id=hd0,if=none,file=%s,format=raw "
> -                           "-device ide-hd,drive=hd0 ",
> -                           data->machine, "kvm:tcg",
> -                           params ? params : "", disk);
> +    bool use_uefi = data->uefi_fl1 && data->uefi_fl2;
> +
> +    if (use_uefi) {
> +        args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s,accel=%s -nodefaults -nographic "
> +            "-drive if=pflash,format=raw,file=%s,readonly "
> +            "-drive if=pflash,format=raw,file=%s,snapshot=on -cdrom %s %s",
> +            data->machine, "kvm:tcg", data->uefi_fl1, data->uefi_fl2,
> +            data->cd, params ? params : "");
> +
> +    } else {
> +        /* Disable kernel irqchip to be able to override apic irq0. */
> +        args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s,accel=%s,kernel-irqchip=off "
> +            "-net none -display none %s "
> +            "-drive id=hd0,if=none,file=%s,format=raw "
> +            "-device ide-hd,drive=hd0 ",
> +             data->machine, "kvm:tcg", params ? params : "", disk);
> +    }
>  
>      data->qts = qtest_init(args);
>  
> -    boot_sector_test(data->qts);
> +    if (use_uefi) {
> +        g_assert(data->scan_len);
> +        data->rsdp_addr = acpi_find_rsdp_address_uefi(data->qts,
> +            data->ram_start, data->scan_len);
> +    } else {
> +        boot_sector_test(data->qts);
> +        test_acpi_rsdp_address(data);
> +    }
>  
>      data->tables = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(AcpiSdtTable));
> -    test_acpi_rsdp_address(data);
>      test_acpi_rsdp_table(data);
>      test_acpi_rxsdt_table(data);
>      test_acpi_fadt_table(data);
> 

Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>

Later on, we should convert the "-drive if=pflash" options to the new
syntax (see commit e33763be7cd3). However, I think that syntax doesn't
work for the aarch64/virt board yet. (Should we file a Launchpad item
about this, as a reminder?)

Thanks,
Laszlo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]