[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC v4 PATCH 02/49] multi-process: util: Add qemu_thread_cancel() t
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC v4 PATCH 02/49] multi-process: util: Add qemu_thread_cancel() to cancel running thread |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Nov 2019 16:35:52 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) |
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:04:58AM -0500, Jag Raman wrote:
>
>
> On 11/13/2019 10:51 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:38:06AM -0500, Jag Raman wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/13/2019 10:30 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 05:08:43AM -0400, Jagannathan Raman wrote:
> > > > > qemu_thread_cancel() added to destroy a given running thread.
> > > > > This will be needed in the following patches.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: John G Johnson <address@hidden>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagannathan Raman <address@hidden>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Elena Ufimtseva <address@hidden>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > include/qemu/thread.h | 1 +
> > > > > util/qemu-thread-posix.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > > > > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > Is this still needed? I thought previous discussion concluded that
> > > > thread cancellation is hard to get right and it's not actually used by
> > > > this series?
> > >
> > > Hi Stefan,
> > >
> > > This is used in PATCH 41/49.
> >
> > I don't believe the cancellation usage in that patch is safe :-)
>
> Thanks for the feedback, we will address that.
>
> May I please ask why it is not safe? Any clarification will help us to
> find a better alternative.
I put some comments inline in the patch 41 explaining my thoughts.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|