qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v6 12/13] hw/i386: Move arch_id decode inside x86_cpus_init


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/13] hw/i386: Move arch_id decode inside x86_cpus_init
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:29:30 +0100

On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:34:39 -0500
Babu Moger <address@hidden> wrote:

> Apicid calculation depends on knowing the total number of numa nodes
> for EPYC cpu models. Right now, we are calculating the arch_id while
> parsing the numa(parse_numa). At this time, it is not known how many
> total numa nodes are configured in the system.
> 
> Move the arch_id inside x86_cpus_init. At this time smp parse is already
> completed and numa node information is available.

now it's correcting bug introduced by 10/13,
which is fine but it leaves bisection broken

perhaps squash this patch in 10/13?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <address@hidden>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/i386/x86.c |   17 +++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/i386/x86.c b/hw/i386/x86.c
> index ad85347142..be93c1fd1b 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/x86.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/x86.c
> @@ -140,6 +140,9 @@ void x86_cpus_init(X86MachineState *x86ms, int 
> default_cpu_version)
>      MachineState *ms = MACHINE(x86ms);
>      MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(x86ms);
>  
> +    /* Check for apicid encoding */
> +    x86_check_apic_id_encoding(ms);
> +
>      x86_cpu_set_default_version(default_cpu_version);
>  
>      /*
> @@ -153,6 +156,12 @@ void x86_cpus_init(X86MachineState *x86ms, int 
> default_cpu_version)
>      x86ms->apic_id_limit = x86_cpu_apic_id_from_index(x86ms,
>                                                        ms->smp.max_cpus - 1) 
> + 1;
>      possible_cpus = mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(ms);
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < ms->smp.cpus; i++) {
> +        ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].arch_id =
> +            x86_cpu_apic_id_from_index(x86ms, i);
> +    }
> +
>      for (i = 0; i < ms->smp.cpus; i++) {
>          x86_cpu_new(x86ms, possible_cpus->cpus[i].arch_id, &error_fatal);
>      }
> @@ -177,8 +186,7 @@ int64_t x86_get_default_cpu_node_id(const MachineState 
> *ms, int idx)
>     init_topo_info(&topo_info, x86ms);
>  
>     assert(idx < ms->possible_cpus->len);
> -   x86ms->topo_ids_from_apicid(ms->possible_cpus->cpus[idx].arch_id,
> -                               &topo_info, &topo_ids);
> +   x86ms->topo_ids_from_idx(&topo_info, idx, &topo_ids);
>     return topo_ids.pkg_id % ms->numa_state->num_nodes;
>  }
>  
> @@ -212,10 +220,7 @@ const CPUArchIdList 
> *x86_possible_cpu_arch_ids(MachineState *ms)
>  
>          ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].type = ms->cpu_type;
>          ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].vcpus_count = 1;
> -        ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].arch_id =
> -            x86_cpu_apic_id_from_index(x86ms, i);
> -        x86ms->topo_ids_from_apicid(ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].arch_id,
> -                                    &topo_info, &topo_ids);
> +        x86ms->topo_ids_from_idx(&topo_info, i, &topo_ids);
>          ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props.has_socket_id = true;
>          ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props.socket_id = topo_ids.pkg_id;
>          if (x86ms->smp_dies > 1) {
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]