Re: [PATCH-for-5.0 v3] Acceptance test: Fix to EXEC migration

[Dr. David Alan Gilbert]

* Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (address@hidden) wrote:
> On 3/25/20 3:10 PM, Oksana Voshchana wrote:
> > Hi Philippe
> > Thanks for the review
> > I have some comments
> > 
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 2:30 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> > <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
> > 
> >     Hi Oksana,
> > 
> >     v2 was
> >     https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg682899.html, so
> >     this is v3. Please increment the version in the patch subject.
> > 
> >     You could also send a simple "ping" to the specific patch, instead of
> >     resending it.
> > 
> >     On 3/25/20 12:31 PM, Oksana Vohchana wrote:
> >      > The exec migration test isn't run a whole test scenario.
> >      > This patch fixes it
> >      >
> >      > Signed-off-by: Oksana Vohchana <address@hidden
> >     <mailto:address@hidden>>
> > 
> >     v1 of this patch has already received reviewers tags
> >     (https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg679629.html),
> >     please collect them and keep them when you resend the same patch:
> > 
> > I have reposted patch without this fix because this change isn't related
> > to the series:
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-03/msg06919.html
> > Is it make sense to keep this fix as a separate patch?
> > 
> >     Fixes: 2e768cb682bf
> >     Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden
> >     <mailto:address@hidden>>
> >     Tested-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <address@hidden
> >     <mailto:address@hidden>>
> > 
> >      > ---
> >      >   tests/acceptance/migration.py | 6 +++---
> >      >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >      >
> >      > diff --git a/tests/acceptance/migration.py
> >     b/tests/acceptance/migration.py
> >      > index a8367ca023..0365289cda 100644
> >      > --- a/tests/acceptance/migration.py
> >      > +++ b/tests/acceptance/migration.py
> >      > @@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ class Migration(Test):
> >      >
> >      >       @skipUnless(find_command('nc', default=False), "'nc'
> >     command not found")
> >      >       def test_migration_with_exec(self):
> >      > -        """
> >      > -        The test works for both netcat-traditional and
> >     netcat-openbsd packages
> >      > -        """
> >      > +        """The test works for both netcat-traditional and
> >     netcat-openbsd packages."""
> > 
> >     Btw why are you changing the comment style?
> > 
> > I got failure in PEP257
> 
> OK, next time please add comment in the patch description too.
> 
> > 
> > 
> >      >           free_port = self._get_free_port()
> >      >           dest_uri = 'exec:nc -l localhost %u' % free_port
> >      > +        src_uri = 'exec:nc localhost %u' % free_port
> >      > +        self.do_migrate(dest_uri, src_uri)
> >      >
> > 
> >     Alex, if there is no Python testing pullreq, can you take this patch
> >     via
> >     your testing tree?
> 
> Cc'ing David since it is migration related.

I tend to leave the tests/acceptance to someone other than the migration
tree; so feel free to take them via testing or trivial given the size.

Dave

> > 
> >     Thanks,
> > 
> >     Phil.
> > 
> > Thanks
> 
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK