[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: deprecation of in-tree builds
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
Subject: |
Re: deprecation of in-tree builds |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:38:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.13.3 (2020-01-12) |
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 08:50:34PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> AIUI from Paolo, the intention is to deprecate and eventually
> stop supporting "in-tree" builds, so that the only option is
> building in a separate build directory. I thought we should
> probably mention that in the 5.0 changelog, so I wrote up some
> text:
>
> https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/5.0#Build_Information
>
> Suggestions for changes/comments etc welcome.
>
> (One thing we will need to fix before we can do separate build
> tree is the Coverity Scan build process, which (a) does an
> in-tree build (b) can't be easily switched to a builddir because
> all the source paths get baked into the scan results and moving
> to a builddir changes them all...)
>
> We could also make configure actively warn if used in
> the source tree.
I've submitted a patch to add such a warning, copying everyone who has
responded in this thread.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, (continued)
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, BALATON Zoltan, 2020/03/31
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, Aleksandar Markovic, 2020/03/30
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, Markus Armbruster, 2020/03/31
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, BALATON Zoltan, 2020/03/31
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/03/31
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, BALATON Zoltan, 2020/03/31
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/03/31
- Re: deprecation of in-tree builds, BALATON Zoltan, 2020/03/31
Re: deprecation of in-tree builds,
Daniel P . Berrangé <=