qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] i386: Hyper-V VMBus ACPI DSDT entry


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] i386: Hyper-V VMBus ACPI DSDT entry
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 12:14:34 +0200

On Fri,  3 Apr 2020 17:23:08 +0300
Jon Doron <address@hidden> wrote:

> Guest OS uses ACPI to discover vmbus presence.  Add a corresponding
> entry to DSDT in case vmbus has been enabled.
> 
> Experimentally Windows guests were found to require this entry to
> include two IRQ resources, so this patch adds two semi-arbitrarily
> chosen ones (7 and 13).  This results, in particular, in parallel port
> conflicting with vmbus.
> 
> TODO: discover and use spare IRQs to avoid conflicts.

CCing Vitaly
as he might know whom to ping wrt 'spec' that describes vmbus
and confirm  with ACPI tables that native hyperv generates.

 
> Signed-off-by: Evgeny Yakovlev <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Kagan <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Doron <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index 2a7e55bae7..6d7fdbbe9b 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>  #include "hw/acpi/tpm.h"
>  #include "hw/acpi/vmgenid.h"
>  #include "hw/boards.h"
> +#include "hw/vmbus/vmbus.h"
>  #include "sysemu/tpm_backend.h"
>  #include "hw/rtc/mc146818rtc_regs.h"
>  #include "migration/vmstate.h"
> @@ -1270,6 +1271,43 @@ static Aml *build_com_device_aml(uint8_t uid)
>      return dev;
>  }
>  
> +static Aml *build_vmbus_device_aml(void)
> +{
> +    Aml *dev;
> +    Aml *method;
> +    Aml *crs;
> +
> +    dev = aml_device("VMBS");
> +    aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("STA", aml_int(0xF)));
> +    aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("VMBus")));
> +    aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(0x0)));
> +    aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_DDN", aml_string("VMBUS")));
> +
> +    method = aml_method("_DIS", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> +    aml_append(method, aml_store(aml_and(aml_name("STA"), aml_int(0xD), 
> NULL),
> +                                     aml_name("STA")));
> +    aml_append(dev, method);
> +
> +    method = aml_method("_PS0", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> +    aml_append(method, aml_store(aml_or(aml_name("STA"), aml_int(0xF), NULL),
> +                                     aml_name("STA")));
> +    aml_append(dev, method);
> +
> +    method = aml_method("_STA", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> +    aml_append(method, aml_store(aml_name("STA"), aml_local(0)));
> +    aml_append(method, aml_return(aml_local(0)));
> +    aml_append(dev, method);
does it need all that complicated _STA handling?
Would simple
   aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_STA", aml_int(0xF)));
work for you?

> +    aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_PS3", aml_int(0x0)));
> +
> +    crs = aml_resource_template();
> +    aml_append(crs, aml_irq_no_flags(7));
> +    aml_append(crs, aml_irq_no_flags(13));
> +    aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CRS", crs));
> +
> +    return dev;
> +}
> +
>  static void build_isa_devices_aml(Aml *table)
>  {
>      ISADevice *fdc = pc_find_fdc0();
> @@ -1296,6 +1334,10 @@ static void build_isa_devices_aml(Aml *table)
>          build_acpi_ipmi_devices(scope, BUS(obj), "\\_SB.PCI0.ISA");
>      }
>  
> +    if (vmbus_exists()) {
> +        aml_append(scope, build_vmbus_device_aml());
> +    }
> +
>      aml_append(table, scope);
>  }
>  




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]