qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] accel/tcg: Add stub for probe_access()


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [PATCH] accel/tcg: Add stub for probe_access()
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:49:07 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0

On 23.04.20 09:10, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> The TCG helpers where added in b92e5a22ec3 in softmmu_template.h.
> probe_write() was added in there in 3b4afc9e75a to be moved out
> to accel/tcg/cputlb.c in 3b08f0a9254, and was later refactored
> as probe_access() in c25c283df0f.
> Since it is a TCG specific helper, add a stub to avoid failures
> when building without TCG, such:
> 
>   target/arm/helper.o: In function `probe_read':
>   include/exec/exec-all.h:345: undefined reference to `probe_access'

I think you're missing the most important commit:

0d57b4999220 ("target/arm: Add support for DC CVAP & DC CVADP ins")

I do wonder if dccvap_writefn() and calling code should be compiled for
TCG only (CONFIG_TCG). I assume it is only called from TCG code -
otherwise it would already be semi-broken.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> ---
> Cc: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> Cc: Emilio G. Cota <address@hidden>
> Cc: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
> ---
>  accel/stubs/tcg-stub.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/accel/stubs/tcg-stub.c b/accel/stubs/tcg-stub.c
> index 677191a69c..e4bbf997aa 100644
> --- a/accel/stubs/tcg-stub.c
> +++ b/accel/stubs/tcg-stub.c
> @@ -22,3 +22,10 @@ void tb_flush(CPUState *cpu)
>  void tlb_set_dirty(CPUState *cpu, target_ulong vaddr)
>  {
>  }
> +
> +void *probe_access(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong addr, int size,
> +                   MMUAccessType access_type, int mmu_idx, uintptr_t retaddr)
> +{
> +     /* Handled by hardware accelerator. */
> +     g_assert_not_reached();
> +}
> 

Still, this makes sense to me as well

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]