[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] virtio-balloon: fix free page hinting without an ioth
From: |
Alexander Duyck |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] virtio-balloon: fix free page hinting without an iothread |
Date: |
Mon, 18 May 2020 08:01:13 -0700 |
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 1:37 AM David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> In case we don't have an iothread, we mark the feature as abscent but
> still add the queue. 'free_page_bh' remains set to NULL.
>
> qemu-system-i386 \
> -M microvm \
> -nographic \
> -device virtio-balloon-device,free-page-hint=true \
> -nographic \
> -display none \
> -monitor none \
> -serial none \
> -qtest stdio
>
> Doing a "write 0xc0000e30 0x24
> 0x030000000300000003000000030000000300000003000000030000000300000003000000"
>
> We will trigger a SEGFAULT. Let's move the check and bail out.
>
> While at it, move the static initializations to instance_initialize().
>
> Fixes: c13c4153f76d ("virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT")
> Reported-by: Alexander Bulekov <address@hidden>
> Cc: Wei Wang <address@hidden>
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> Cc: Alexander Duyck <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c
> index 065cd450f1..dc3b1067ab 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c
> @@ -789,6 +789,13 @@ static void virtio_balloon_device_realize(DeviceState
> *dev, Error **errp)
> return;
> }
>
> + if (virtio_has_feature(s->host_features,
> + VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT) && !s->iothread) {
> + error_setg(errp, "'free-page-hint' requires 'iothread' to be set");
> + virtio_cleanup(vdev);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> s->ivq = virtio_add_queue(vdev, 128, virtio_balloon_handle_output);
> s->dvq = virtio_add_queue(vdev, 128, virtio_balloon_handle_output);
> s->svq = virtio_add_queue(vdev, 128, virtio_balloon_receive_stats);
> @@ -797,24 +804,11 @@ static void virtio_balloon_device_realize(DeviceState
> *dev, Error **errp)
> VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT)) {
> s->free_page_vq = virtio_add_queue(vdev, VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE,
>
> virtio_balloon_handle_free_page_vq);
> - s->free_page_report_status = FREE_PAGE_REPORT_S_STOP;
> - s->free_page_report_cmd_id =
> - VIRTIO_BALLOON_FREE_PAGE_REPORT_CMD_ID_MIN;
> - s->free_page_report_notify.notify =
> -
> virtio_balloon_free_page_report_notify;
> precopy_add_notifier(&s->free_page_report_notify);
> - if (s->iothread) {
> - object_ref(OBJECT(s->iothread));
> - s->free_page_bh =
> aio_bh_new(iothread_get_aio_context(s->iothread),
> - virtio_ballloon_get_free_page_hints,
> s);
> - qemu_mutex_init(&s->free_page_lock);
> - qemu_cond_init(&s->free_page_cond);
> - s->block_iothread = false;
> - } else {
> - /* Simply disable this feature if the iothread wasn't created. */
> - s->host_features &= ~(1 << VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT);
> - virtio_error(vdev, "iothread is missing");
> - }
> +
> + object_ref(OBJECT(s->iothread));
> + s->free_page_bh = aio_bh_new(iothread_get_aio_context(s->iothread),
> + virtio_ballloon_get_free_page_hints, s);
> }
> reset_stats(s);
> }
> @@ -892,6 +886,13 @@ static void virtio_balloon_instance_init(Object *obj)
> {
> VirtIOBalloon *s = VIRTIO_BALLOON(obj);
>
> + qemu_mutex_init(&s->free_page_lock);
> + qemu_cond_init(&s->free_page_cond);
> + s->free_page_report_status = FREE_PAGE_REPORT_S_STOP;
> + s->free_page_report_cmd_id = VIRTIO_BALLOON_FREE_PAGE_REPORT_CMD_ID_MIN;
> + s->free_page_report_notify.notify =
> virtio_balloon_free_page_report_notify;
> + s->block_iothread = false;
> +
> object_property_add(obj, "guest-stats", "guest statistics",
> balloon_stats_get_all, NULL, NULL, s);
>
So the one nit I have is that I am not sure you need to bother with
initializing block_iothread since it should already be initialized to
false/0 shouldn't it? Otherwise this all looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <address@hidden>