Re: [RFC v1 09/10] i386: split cpu.c and defer x86 models registration

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 10/11/20 18:55, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > I think we should not try yo implement interfaces conditionally (i.e. have
> > TYPE_X86_ACCEL implemented only on qemu-system-{i386,x86_64} and not
> > qemu-system-arm), even if technically the accel/ objects are per-target
> > (specific_ss) rather than common.
> If the accel objects are already per target, it seems appropriate
> to have a QOM type hierarchy that reflects that.
>
> `qemu-system-x86_64 -accel kvm` would create a kvm-x86_64-accel
> object, but `qemu-system-arm -accel kvm` would create a
> kvm-arm-accel.

... and fall back to kvm-accel?  So accel_find would be the only place 
to change.

Paolo

> *-x86_64-accel and *-i386-accel would all implement
> INTERFACE_X86_ACCEL.