qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: virtio-9p-test.c:300:v9fs_req_recv: assertion failed (hdr.id == id):


From: Christian Schoenebeck
Subject: Re: virtio-9p-test.c:300:v9fs_req_recv: assertion failed (hdr.id == id): (7 == 73)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:45:12 +0100

On Montag, 23. November 2020 14:48:15 CET Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Montag, 23. November 2020 14:17:34 CET Greg Kurz wrote:
> > Fixed maintainer's address: s/oss@crudebyte.com/qemu_oss@crudebyte.com
> > 
> > On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 17:03:14 -0500
> > 
> > Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Hi, I'm consistently seeing this assertion running the qemu-5.2.0  test
> > > suite. rc0, rc1, rc2 have been consistently affected, it reproduces
> > > consistently in parts of Fedora's build system. Here's an example build
> > > log for rc2 x86 against Fedora 32
> > > 
> > > https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@kubevirt/qemu-5.2.0-> 
> > > > > 0.
> > > 6.rc2/fedora-32-x86_64/01781514-qemu/builder-live.log.gz
> > > 
> > > The full test error:
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > PASS 26 qtest-arm/qos-test
> > > /arm/virt/virtio-mmio/virtio-bus/virtio-9p-device/virtio-9p/virtio-9p-te
> > > st
> > > s/synth/readdir/split_128 PASS 27 qtest-arm/qos-test
> > > /arm/virt/virtio-mmio/virtio-bus/virtio-9p-device/virtio-9p/virtio-9p-te
> > > st
> > > s/local/config
> > 
> > Ok so the next test is supposed to be:
> > 
> > /arm/virt/virtio-mmio/virtio-bus/virtio-9p-device/virtio-9p/virtio-9p-test
> > s/ local/create_dir
> > 
> > This was added recently. This configures the virtio-9p device in QEMU
> > to serve a real test directory from the host. This test directory is
> > created under the current directory of the test process. The purpose
> > of the test is then to ask the 9p server to create a directory within
> > the test directory.
> > 
> > > Received response 7 (RLERROR) instead of 73 (RMKDIR)
> > > ERROR qtest-arm/qos-test - Bail out!
> > > ERROR:../tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c:300:v9fs_req_recv: assertion
> > > failed (hdr.id == id): (7 == 73)
> > > Rlerror has errno 95 (Operation not supported)
> > 
> > So this basically means that QEMU got ENOTSUP/EOPNOTSUPP when calling
> > mkdir() into the test directory... not sure what could cause that. I'd
> > need more details on the filesystem setup for the build.
> > 
> > Anyway, we already experienced some breakage in upstream CI because of
> > the same family of tests that do real access to the host filesystem.
> > Since they're being introduced in QEMU 5.2, I'll try to see if I can
> > disable them to be run by default for RC3.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > --
> > Greg
> > 
> > > **
> > > ERROR:../tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c:300:v9fs_req_recv: assertion
> > > failed (hdr.id == id): (7 == 73)
> > > make: *** [Makefile.mtest:1257: run-test-155] Error 1
> > > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.EG4Dav (%check)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Cole
> 
> Yeah, looks like the mkdir() call which is supposed to create the 9p test
> directory, is failing there for some reason. The question is how to find
> that out (effectively) without having access to an affected system.
> 
> It's now too late for 5.2, but I think for 6.0 it would make sense
> introducing a dedicated 9p option loglevel=..., so we can tell people to
> enable this to capture the precise source location where an error ocurred.
> That would mean spreading a huge bunch of macros all over the 9p code base,
> but it would definitely help a lot understanding the root cause of reported
> issues in an efficient way.
> 
> Best regards,
> Christian Schoenebeck

Cole, does the affected host system probably not have xattrs enabled on its 
file system?

Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]