[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/31] hw/cxl/device: Implement the CAP array (8.2.8.1
From: |
Ben Widawsky |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/31] hw/cxl/device: Implement the CAP array (8.2.8.1-2) |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Feb 2021 14:15:53 -0800 |
On 21-02-02 12:23:50, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:59:21 -0800
> Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > This implements all device MMIO up to the first capability. That
> > includes the CXL Device Capabilities Array Register, as well as all of
> > the CXL Device Capability Header Registers. The latter are filled in as
> > they are implemented in the following patches.
> >
> > Endianness and alignment are managed by softmmu memory core.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> A few trivials
> > ---
> > hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > hw/cxl/meson.build | 1 +
> > include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h | 27 +++++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644 hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..bb15ad9a0f
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
> > +/*
> > + * CXL Utility library for devices
> > + *
> > + * Copyright(C) 2020 Intel Corporation.
> > + *
> > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2. See the
> > + * COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> > +#include "qemu/log.h"
> > +#include "hw/cxl/cxl.h"
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Device registers have no restrictions per the spec, and so fall back to
> > the
> > + * default memory mapped register rules in 8.2:
> > + * Software shall use CXL.io Memory Read and Write to access memory
> > mapped
> > + * register defined in this section. Unless otherwise specified, software
> > + * shall restrict the accesses width based on the following:
> > + * • A 32 bit register shall be accessed as a 1 Byte, 2 Bytes or 4
> > Bytes
>
> odd spacing
>
> > + * quantity.
> > + * • A 64 bit register shall be accessed as a 1 Byte, 2 Bytes, 4 Bytes
> > or 8
> > + * Bytes
> > + * • The address shall be a multiple of the access width, e.g. when
> > + * accessing a register as a 4 Byte quantity, the address shall be
> > + * multiple of 4.
> > + * • The accesses shall map to contiguous bytes.If these rules are not
> > + * followed, the behavior is undefined
> > + */
> > +
> > +static uint64_t caps_reg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, unsigned size)
> > +{
> > + CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate = opaque;
> > +
> > + return cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state32[offset / 4];
> > +}
> > +
> > +static uint64_t dev_reg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, unsigned size)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const MemoryRegionOps dev_ops = {
> > + .read = dev_reg_read,
> > + .write = NULL, /* status register is read only */
> > + .endianness = DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
> > + .valid = {
> > + .min_access_size = 1,
> > + .max_access_size = 8,
> > + .unaligned = false,
> > + },
> > + .impl = {
> > + .min_access_size = 1,
> > + .max_access_size = 8,
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const MemoryRegionOps caps_ops = {
> > + .read = caps_reg_read,
> > + .write = NULL, /* caps registers are read only */
> > + .endianness = DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
> > + .valid = {
> > + .min_access_size = 1,
> > + .max_access_size = 8,
> > + .unaligned = false,
> > + },
> > + .impl = {
> > + .min_access_size = 4,
> > + .max_access_size = 4,
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +void cxl_device_register_block_init(Object *obj, CXLDeviceState
> > *cxl_dstate)
> > +{
> > + /* This will be a BAR, so needs to be rounded up to pow2 for PCI spec
> > */
> > + memory_region_init(&cxl_dstate->device_registers, obj,
> > "device-registers",
> > + pow2ceil(CXL_MMIO_SIZE));
> > +
> > + memory_region_init_io(&cxl_dstate->caps, obj, &caps_ops, cxl_dstate,
> > + "cap-array", CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_OFFSET - 0);
>
> Specifying a size in terms of the offset of another region isn't exactly
> intuitive so perhaps a comment on why or better yet actually use a size
> parameter covering what is there rather than simply the region below
> the CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_OFFSET.
>
I didn't have a simple way to accommodate this before, but now I do have
CXL_CAPS_SIZE which is what we want here.
You also made me realize I have a PEMDAS bug in CXL_CAPS_SIZE, so thanks.
>
> > + memory_region_init_io(&cxl_dstate->device, obj, &dev_ops, cxl_dstate,
> > + "device-status", CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_LENGTH);
> > +
> > + memory_region_add_subregion(&cxl_dstate->device_registers, 0,
> > + &cxl_dstate->caps);
> > + memory_region_add_subregion(&cxl_dstate->device_registers,
> > + CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_OFFSET,
> > + &cxl_dstate->device);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void device_reg_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate) { }
> > +
> > +void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> > +{
> > + uint32_t *cap_hdrs = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state32;
> > + const int cap_count = 1;
> > +
> > + /* CXL Device Capabilities Array Register */
> > + ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0);
> > + ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_VERSION, 1);
> > + ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY2, CAP_COUNT, cap_count);
> > +
> > + cxl_device_cap_init(cxl_dstate, DEVICE, 1);
> > + device_reg_init_common(cxl_dstate);
> > +}
> > diff --git a/hw/cxl/meson.build b/hw/cxl/meson.build
> > index 00c3876a0f..47154d6850 100644
> > --- a/hw/cxl/meson.build
> > +++ b/hw/cxl/meson.build
> > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> > softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_CXL', if_true: files(
> > 'cxl-component-utils.c',
> > + 'cxl-device-utils.c',
> > ))
> > diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> > index a85f250503..f3bcf19410 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> > @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@
> > #define CXL_DEVICE_CAP_HDR1_OFFSET 0x10 /* Figure 138 */
> > #define CXL_DEVICE_CAP_REG_SIZE 0x10 /* 8.2.8.2 */
> > #define CXL_DEVICE_CAPS_MAX 4 /* 8.2.8.2.1 + 8.2.8.5 */
> > +#define CXL_CAPS_SIZE \
> > + (CXL_DEVICE_CAP_REG_SIZE * CXL_DEVICE_CAPS_MAX + 1) /* +1 for header */
> >
> > #define CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_OFFSET 0x80 /* Read comment above */
> > #define CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_LENGTH 0x8 /* 8.2.8.3.1 */
> > @@ -70,11 +72,18 @@
> > #define CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH \
> > (CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_SIZE + CXL_MAILBOX_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE)
> >
> > +#define CXL_MMIO_SIZE \
> > + CXL_DEVICE_CAP_REG_SIZE + CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_LENGTH + \
> > + CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH
> > +
> > typedef struct cxl_device_state {
> > MemoryRegion device_registers;
> >
> > /* mmio for device capabilities array - 8.2.8.2 */
> > - MemoryRegion caps;
> > + struct {
> > + MemoryRegion caps;
> > + uint32_t caps_reg_state32[CXL_CAPS_SIZE / 4];
> > + };
>
> With this unnamed,w hat is the benefit of having these two in a
> struct? The naming makes it clear they are related anyway.
>
> >
> > /* mmio for the device status registers 8.2.8.3 */
> > MemoryRegion device;
> > @@ -126,6 +135,22 @@ CXL_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_HEADER_REGISTER(DEVICE,
> > CXL_DEVICE_CAP_HDR1_OFFSET)
> > CXL_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_HEADER_REGISTER(MAILBOX, CXL_DEVICE_CAP_HDR1_OFFSET
> > + \
> > CXL_DEVICE_CAP_REG_SIZE)
> >
> > +#define cxl_device_cap_init(dstate, reg, cap_id)
> > \
> > + do {
> > \
> > + uint32_t *cap_hdrs = dstate->caps_reg_state32;
> > \
> > + int which = R_CXL_DEV_##reg##_CAP_HDR0;
> > \
> > + cap_hdrs[which] =
> > \
> > + FIELD_DP32(cap_hdrs[which], CXL_DEV_##reg##_CAP_HDR0, CAP_ID,
> > cap_id); \
> > + cap_hdrs[which] = FIELD_DP32(
> > \
> > + cap_hdrs[which], CXL_DEV_##reg##_CAP_HDR0, CAP_VERSION, 1);
> > \
> > + cap_hdrs[which + 1] =
> > \
> > + FIELD_DP32(cap_hdrs[which + 1], CXL_DEV_##reg##_CAP_HDR1,
> > \
> > + CAP_OFFSET, CXL_##reg##_REGISTERS_OFFSET);
> > \
> > + cap_hdrs[which + 2] =
> > \
> > + FIELD_DP32(cap_hdrs[which + 2], CXL_DEV_##reg##_CAP_HDR2,
> > \
> > + CAP_LENGTH, CXL_##reg##_REGISTERS_LENGTH);
> > \
> > + } while (0)
> > +
> > REG32(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CAP, 0)
> > FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CAP, PAYLOAD_SIZE, 0, 5)
> > FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CAP, INT_CAP, 5, 1)
>
>
- [RFC PATCH v3 01/31] hw/pci/cxl: Add a CXL component type (interface), (continued)
- [RFC PATCH v3 01/31] hw/pci/cxl: Add a CXL component type (interface), Ben Widawsky, 2021/02/01
- [RFC PATCH v3 02/31] hw/cxl/component: Introduce CXL components (8.1.x, 8.2.5), Ben Widawsky, 2021/02/01
- [RFC PATCH v3 03/31] hw/cxl/device: Introduce a CXL device (8.2.8), Ben Widawsky, 2021/02/01
- [RFC PATCH v3 04/31] hw/cxl/device: Implement the CAP array (8.2.8.1-2), Ben Widawsky, 2021/02/01
- [RFC PATCH v3 05/31] hw/cxl/device: Implement basic mailbox (8.2.8.4), Ben Widawsky, 2021/02/01
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 05/31] hw/cxl/device: Implement basic mailbox (8.2.8.4), Jonathan Cameron, 2021/02/11
[RFC PATCH v3 07/31] hw/cxl/device: Add cheap EVENTS implementation (8.2.9.1), Ben Widawsky, 2021/02/01
[RFC PATCH v3 06/31] hw/cxl/device: Add memory device utilities, Ben Widawsky, 2021/02/01