[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] hw/sd: sd: Actually perform the erase operation
From: |
Bin Meng |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] hw/sd: sd: Actually perform the erase operation |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Feb 2021 10:41:48 +0800 |
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 6:28 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>
> On 2/16/21 4:02 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
> > From: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
> >
> > At present the sd_erase() does not erase the requested range of card
> > data to 0xFFs. Let's make the erase operation actually happen.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - honor the write protection bits for SDSC cards
> >
> > hw/sd/sd.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
> > index f1f98bdec3..b386f16fcb 100644
> > --- a/hw/sd/sd.c
> > +++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
> > @@ -766,6 +766,9 @@ static void sd_erase(SDState *sd)
> > uint64_t erase_start = sd->erase_start;
> > uint64_t erase_end = sd->erase_end;
> > bool sdsc = true;
> > + uint64_t wpnum;
> > + uint64_t erase_addr;
> > + int erase_len = 1 << HWBLOCK_SHIFT;
> >
> > trace_sdcard_erase(sd->erase_start, sd->erase_end);
> > if (sd->erase_start == INVALID_ADDRESS
> > @@ -794,17 +797,20 @@ static void sd_erase(SDState *sd)
> > sd->erase_end = INVALID_ADDRESS;
> > sd->csd[14] |= 0x40;
> >
> > - /* Only SDSC cards support write protect groups */
> > - if (sdsc) {
> > - erase_start = sd_addr_to_wpnum(erase_start);
> > - erase_end = sd_addr_to_wpnum(erase_end);
> > -
> > - for (i = erase_start; i <= erase_end; i++) {
> > - assert(i < sd->wpgrps_size);
> > - if (test_bit(i, sd->wp_groups)) {
> > + memset(sd->data, 0xff, erase_len);
> > + erase_addr = erase_start;
> > + for (i = 0; i <= (erase_end - erase_start) / erase_len; i++) {
> > + if (sdsc) {
> > + /* Only SDSC cards support write protect groups */
> > + wpnum = sd_addr_to_wpnum(erase_addr);
> > + assert(wpnum < sd->wpgrps_size);
> > + if (test_bit(wpnum, sd->wp_groups)) {
> > sd->card_status |= WP_ERASE_SKIP;
> > + continue;
>
> So if a group is protected, you skip it but don't increase erase_addr.
> If G#4 is protected and G#5 isn't, when you check G#5 you end erasing
> G#4.
>
Oops, good catch!
I will send v2.
> > }
> > }
> > + BLK_WRITE_BLOCK(erase_addr, erase_len);
> > + erase_addr += erase_len;
> > }
> > }
Regards,
Bin
- [PATCH v2 1/8] hw/sd: sd: Fix address check in sd_erase(), (continued)
- [PATCH v2 1/8] hw/sd: sd: Fix address check in sd_erase(), Bin Meng, 2021/02/16
- [PATCH v2 2/8] hw/sd: sd: Only SDSC cards support CMD28/29/30, Bin Meng, 2021/02/16
- [PATCH v2 3/8] hw/sd: sd: Fix CMD30 response type, Bin Meng, 2021/02/16
- [PATCH v2 5/8] hw/sd: sd: Skip write protect groups check in sd_erase() for high capacity cards, Bin Meng, 2021/02/16
- [PATCH v2 4/8] hw/sd: sd: Move the sd_block_{read, write} and macros ahead, Bin Meng, 2021/02/16
- [PATCH v2 6/8] hw/sd: sd: Actually perform the erase operation, Bin Meng, 2021/02/16
- [PATCH v2 8/8] hw/sd: sd: Bypass the RCA check for CMD13 in SPI mode, Bin Meng, 2021/02/16
- [PATCH v2 7/8] hw/sd: sd: Skip write protect groups check in CMD24/25 for high capacity cards, Bin Meng, 2021/02/16
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] hw/sd: sd: Erase operation and other fixes, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/02/19