[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: softmmu vs sysemu [Was: Re: [RFC v1 06/38] target/arm: split off cpu

From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: softmmu vs sysemu [Was: Re: [RFC v1 06/38] target/arm: split off cpu-softmmu.c]
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:43:20 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0

On 2/23/21 7:51 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2/23/21 10:18 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>> I am all for "just getting it done", but here the i386 and the arm series 
>> become a mixture of things that I am not comfortable with,
>> I'd prefer a dedicated series..
> You're thinking too deeply about the problem that I'm reporting to you about
> this patch set.
> I just want the file naming done correctly, while you're renaming.  That is
> something you are actively changing in this patch set, so we should get it 
> right.

So what is the new directory structure?

- user/
- sysemu/{tcg,kvm,}/


- tcg/a-user.c
- tcg/b-sysemu.c
- kvm/kvm.c

> You don't have to worry about ifdef CONFIG_SOFTMMU vs ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> within the code itself.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]