[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option
From: |
Tom Rini |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:13:23 -0400 |
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 06:36:12PM +0300, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 27.10.2021 17.08, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi François,
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 00:07, François Ozog <francois.ozog@linaro.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Simon
> > >
> > > Position unchanged on this series: adding fake dts for boards that
> > > generate their device tree in the dts directory is not good. If you have
> > > them in documentation the it is acceptable.
> >
> > I think we are going to have to disagree on this one. I actually used
> > the qemu one in testing/development recently. We have to have a way to
> > develop in-tree with U-Boot. It does not impinge on any of your use
> > cases, so far as I know.
> >
>
> How about having the file just contain a single line
>
> #include <generated-qemu-arm.dts>
>
> ... where this generated-*.dts is not checked to the source tree. Then of
> course comments on how to generate it via qemu -dumpdtb + dtc, with
> appropriate precautions (ie. must be regenerated if qemu command line is
> changed or qemu is upgraded), intended use case, and so forth.
That seems like it would help the development workflow, yes.
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [PATCH v5 03/26] arm: qemu: Mention -nographic in the docs, (continued)
- [PATCH v5 03/26] arm: qemu: Mention -nographic in the docs, Simon Glass, 2021/10/25
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option, François Ozog, 2021/10/26
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option, Tom Rini, 2021/10/27
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option, Tom Rini, 2021/10/27
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option, Tuomas Tynkkynen, 2021/10/27
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option,
Tom Rini <=