[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 17/23] linux-user/openrisc: Use force_sig_fault
From: |
Stafford Horne |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 17/23] linux-user/openrisc: Use force_sig_fault |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Nov 2021 05:35:00 +0900 |
On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 10:08:41AM -0400, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Use the new function instead of setting up a target_siginfo_t
> and calling queue_signal. Fill in the missing PC for SIGTRAP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
> linux-user/openrisc/cpu_loop.c | 18 +++---------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/openrisc/cpu_loop.c b/linux-user/openrisc/cpu_loop.c
> index 3cfdbbf037..9b3d6743d2 100644
> --- a/linux-user/openrisc/cpu_loop.c
> +++ b/linux-user/openrisc/cpu_loop.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ void cpu_loop(CPUOpenRISCState *env)
> CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env);
> int trapnr;
> abi_long ret;
> - target_siginfo_t info;
>
> for (;;) {
> cpu_exec_start(cs);
> @@ -55,27 +54,16 @@ void cpu_loop(CPUOpenRISCState *env)
> }
> break;
> case EXCP_ALIGN:
> - info.si_signo = TARGET_SIGBUS;
> - info.si_errno = 0;
> - info.si_code = TARGET_BUS_ADRALN;
> - info._sifields._sigfault._addr = env->pc;
> - queue_signal(env, info.si_signo, QEMU_SI_FAULT, &info);
> + force_sig_fault(TARGET_SIGBUS, TARGET_BUS_ADRALN, env->eear);
> break;
> case EXCP_ILLEGAL:
> - info.si_signo = TARGET_SIGILL;
> - info.si_errno = 0;
> - info.si_code = TARGET_ILL_ILLOPC;
> - info._sifields._sigfault._addr = env->pc;
> - queue_signal(env, info.si_signo, QEMU_SI_FAULT, &info);
> + force_sig_fault(TARGET_SIGILL, TARGET_ILL_ILLOPC, env->pc);
> break;
> case EXCP_INTERRUPT:
> /* We processed the pending cpu work above. */
> break;
> case EXCP_DEBUG:
> - info.si_signo = TARGET_SIGTRAP;
> - info.si_errno = 0;
> - info.si_code = TARGET_TRAP_BRKPT;
> - queue_signal(env, info.si_signo, QEMU_SI_FAULT, &info);
> + force_sig_fault(TARGET_SIGTRAP, TARGET_TRAP_BRKPT, env->pc);
> break;
> case EXCP_ATOMIC:
> cpu_exec_step_atomic(cs);
This looks ok to me.
Reviewed-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
[PATCH v3 20/23] linux-user/s390x: Use force_sig_fault, Richard Henderson, 2021/11/03
[PATCH v3 17/23] linux-user/openrisc: Use force_sig_fault, Richard Henderson, 2021/11/03
- Re: [PATCH v3 17/23] linux-user/openrisc: Use force_sig_fault,
Stafford Horne <=
[PATCH v3 18/23] linux-user/ppc: Use force_sig_fault, Richard Henderson, 2021/11/03
[PATCH v3 21/23] linux-user/sh4: Use force_sig_fault, Richard Henderson, 2021/11/03
[PATCH v3 19/23] linux-user/riscv: Use force_sig_fault, Richard Henderson, 2021/11/03
[PATCH v3 23/23] linux-user/xtensa: Use force_sig_fault, Richard Henderson, 2021/11/03
[PATCH v3 22/23] linux-user/sparc: Use force_sig_fault, Richard Henderson, 2021/11/03