qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] tests: Update CentOS 8 container to CentOS Stream 8


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tests: Update CentOS 8 container to CentOS Stream 8
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 18:47:14 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0

On 1/2/22 18:35, Alex Bennée wrote:

Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> writes:

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 11:19:11AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
+++ b/tests/docker/dockerfiles/centos8.docker
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
  # THIS FILE WAS AUTO-GENERATED
  #
-#  $ lcitool dockerfile centos-8 qemu
+#  $ lcitool dockerfile centos-stream-8 qemu
  #
  # https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt-ci

-FROM docker.io/library/centos:8
+FROM quay.io/centos/centos:stream8
[...]
+++ b/tests/lcitool/refresh
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ ubuntu2004_tsanhack = [
  ]

  try:
-   generate_dockerfile("centos8", "centos-8")
+   generate_dockerfile("centos8", "centos-stream-8")

I'm not convinced this is a good idea.

CentOS 8 and CentOS Stream 8 are two pretty distinct operating
systems in terms of update cadence and stability expectations, so I
think that using the label "centos8" for containers and CI jobs that
are actually consuming CentOS Stream 8 is going to be a source of
confusion.

I recommend proceeding with a thorough rename, after which the string
"centos8" no longer shows up anywhere, instead.

Thomas do you agree? Should I drop the patch in favour or a new version
with a more extensive rename?

I agree with Andrea :)

Andrea, do you think it is acceptable to merge this and fix on top, or
we should do it properly from start?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]