[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] virtio-iommu: Default to bypass during boot
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] virtio-iommu: Default to bypass during boot |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Feb 2022 12:10:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.34 (https://notmuchmail.org) |
On Tue, Feb 08 2022, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 06:42:57PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 27 2022, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> > @@ -988,9 +1025,9 @@ static void virtio_iommu_device_realize(DeviceState
>> > *dev, Error **errp)
>> > virtio_add_feature(&s->features, VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_INPUT_RANGE);
>> > virtio_add_feature(&s->features, VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_DOMAIN_RANGE);
>> > virtio_add_feature(&s->features, VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_MAP_UNMAP);
>> > - virtio_add_feature(&s->features, VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS);
>> > virtio_add_feature(&s->features, VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_MMIO);
>> > virtio_add_feature(&s->features, VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_PROBE);
>> > + virtio_add_feature(&s->features, VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS_CONFIG);
>>
>> Hm. In the other patch, you say that you don't support cross-version
>> migration (I assume across QEMU versions?)
>
> I missed that ... where does it say this?
In bf447d9b-c039-ccdc-f24f-ab8b56c1b196@redhat.com and follow-ups
(unless I misread that; maybe it's more about this concrete boundary and
not generally?)
>
>> Because changing the feature
>> set will be guest-visible, and would need some compat handling if you
>> plan to support this.