qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Deprecate C virtiofsd


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Deprecate C virtiofsd
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:57:16 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/2.1.5 (2021-12-30)

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 04:50:40PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> 
> There's a nice new Rust implementation out there; recommend people
> do new work on that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> ---
>  docs/about/deprecated.rst | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> index 47a594a3b6..3a0e15f8f5 100644
> --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> @@ -454,3 +454,17 @@ nanoMIPS ISA
>  
>  The ``nanoMIPS`` ISA has never been upstreamed to any compiler toolchain.
>  As it is hard to generate binaries for it, declare it deprecated.
> +
> +Tools
> +-----
> +
> +virtiofsd
> +'''''''''
> +
> +There is a new Rust implementation of ``virtiofs`` at
> +``https://gitlab.com/virtio-fs/virtiofsd``;
> +since this is now marked stable, new development should be done on that
> +rather than the existing C version in the QEMU tree.
> +The C version will still accept fixes and patches that
> +are already in development for the moment.

Just to be clear, 'deprecation' is usually expected to turn into
'deletion' a minimum of 2 releases later.  We are targetting the
C virtiofsd to be deleted, right ?  The last sentance here gives
vibes that we're expecting it to stick around despite deprecation.

Assuming we're deleting it after deprecation, then I think thue
message should be more direct in telling people they shold be
proactively switching to deployment of the rust version. Something
along lines of

  "The C implementation is in maintenance mode only and will
   be deleted once the deprecation period is complete. New
   deployments of virtiofs are strongly recommended to switch
   to use of the Rust implementation of virtiofsd, which is
   a drop in replacement will compatible command line and
   featureset."

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]