[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10
From: |
Greg Kurz |
Subject: |
Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10 |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Feb 2022 15:23:15 +0100 |
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 11:30:12 +0100
Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> On Dienstag, 15. Februar 2022 08:01:37 CET Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:43:51 +0300
> >
> > Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org> wrote:
> > > Why g_new0 and not just g_malloc0? This is smallest code change, which
> > > seems appropriate for a bug fix.
> >
> > I prefer g_new0() for the exact reasons that are provided in QEMU's
> > official coding style docs/devel/style.rst:
> [...]
> > I'm fine with the acceptable version as well. The only important thing is
> > to fix the synth backend.
> >
> > Cheers,
>
> Hi, is anybody working on a v5 of this patch? If not I will send one this
> evening to bring this issue forward, because it is blocking my queue.
>
I'm not, please post a patch and I'll review it ASAP.
Cheers,
--
Greg
> Best regards,
> Christian Schoenebeck
>
>
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, (continued)
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Peter Maydell, 2022/02/13
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Christian Schoenebeck, 2022/02/14
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Greg Kurz, 2022/02/14
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Christian Schoenebeck, 2022/02/14
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Vitaly Chikunov, 2022/02/14
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Christian Schoenebeck, 2022/02/14
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Greg Kurz, 2022/02/15
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Christian Schoenebeck, 2022/02/16
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10,
Greg Kurz <=
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2022/02/16
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Vitaly Chikunov, 2022/02/16
- Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10, Christian Schoenebeck, 2022/02/16