Re: [PULL 0/5] 9p queue 2022-02-10

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

On 16/2/22 11:30, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Dienstag, 15. Februar 2022 08:01:37 CET Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:43:51 +0300
> >
> > Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org> wrote:
> > > Why g_new0 and not just g_malloc0? This is smallest code change, which
> > > seems appropriate for a bug fix.
> >
> > I prefer g_new0() for the exact reasons that are provided in QEMU's
> > official coding style docs/devel/style.rst:
> [...]
> > I'm fine with the acceptable version as well. The only important thing is
> > to fix the synth backend.
> >
> > Cheers,
>
> Hi, is anybody working on a v5 of this patch? If not I will send one this
> evening to bring this issue forward, because it is blocking my queue.

If a patch blocks your tree queue, you can simply drop it, ask the
contributor to rework it, and keep merging your tree...