qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v6 12/19] vfio-user: IOMMU support for remote device


From: Jag Raman
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/19] vfio-user: IOMMU support for remote device
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 14:42:49 +0000


> On Mar 7, 2022, at 4:45 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 02:49:53PM +0000, Jag Raman wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 2, 2022, at 11:49 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 07:54:38PM +0000, Jag Raman wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 22, 2022, at 5:40 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 02:48:59AM -0500, Jagannathan Raman wrote:
>>>>>> +struct RemoteIommuElem {
>>>>>> +    AddressSpace  as;
>>>>>> +    MemoryRegion  mr;
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +GHashTable *remote_iommu_elem_by_bdf;
>>>>> 
>>>>> A mutable global hash table requires synchronization when device
>>>>> emulation runs in multiple threads.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I suggest using pci_setup_iommu()'s iommu_opaque argument to avoid the
>>>>> global. If there is only 1 device per remote PCI bus, then there are no
>>>>> further synchronization concerns.
>>>> 
>>>> OK, will avoid the global. We would need to access the hash table
>>>> concurrently since there could be more than one device in the
>>>> same bus - so a mutex would be needed here.
>>> 
>>> I thought the PCIe topology can be set up with a separate buf for each
>>> x-vfio-user-server? I remember something like that in the previous
>>> revision where a root port was instantiated for each x-vfio-user-server.
>> 
>> Yes, we could setup the PCIe topology to be that way. But the user could
>> add more than one device to the same bus, unless the bus type explicitly
>> limits the number of devices to one (BusClass->max_dev).
> 
> Due to how the IOMMU is used to restrict the bus to the vfio-user
> client's DMA mappings, it seems like it's necesssary to limit the number
> of devices to 1 per bus anyway?

Hi Stefan,

“remote_iommu_elem_by_bdf” has a separate entry for each of the BDF
combinations - it provides a separate DMA address space per device. As
such, we don’t have to limit the number of devices to 1 per bus.

Thank you!
--
Jag

> 
> Stefan


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]