[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Should the "extra credit" really be extra?

From: Zak Rogoff
Subject: Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Should the "extra credit" really be extra?
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:45:22 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5

On 11/04/2015 02:44 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> FWIW, I agree *strongly* with that sentiment. We don't need to revisit
> it, but from earlier discussion, I made it clear that I think many of
> the "A" grade level things like "GNU/Linux" vs "Linux" wording really
> should be only extra-credit level, and I agree with Niels that some
> current extra-credit stuff like accessibility and privacy should be
> considered more important.

I won't say I disagree. The criteria as they are embody Richard's
particular perspective on what's important. I do think that it's great
for us to have them even if everyone doesn't agree on all the details.

Zak Rogoff
Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation
GnuPG key fingerprint: 6EB2 B137 347E 6F7C DEDC AFF6 82DE 8D64 B509 0AC8

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]