[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: repo criteria changes

From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: repo criteria changes
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:44:38 -0400

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

I think you are right about "publicly accessible".

It is important to rule out lack of license.

I don't want to make the requirement more strict by requiring works of
art and opinion to have free licenses.  So I would like to use this

  <li id="A4"><p>Does not permit nonfree licenses (or lack of license)
      for works for practical use, in publicly accessible
      repos. <strong>(A4)</strong></p></li>

  <li id="A4-1"><p>Does not permit nonsharing licenses (or lack of
      license) for any works in publicly accessible
      repos. <strong>(A4-1)</strong></p></li>

Dr Richard Stallman (
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (
Founder, Free Software Foundation (
Internet Hall-of-Famer (

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]