[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: repo criteria changes

From: bill-auger
Subject: Re: repo criteria changes
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:10:40 -0400

On Wed, 09 Jun 2021 23:32:59 -0400 Richard wrote:
>    <li id="A4"><p>Does not permit nonfree licenses (or lack of license) for
> -      works for practical use. <strong>(A4)</strong></p></li>
> +      works for practical use, in public repos. 
> <strong>(A4)</strong></p></li>

we discussed changes to A4 previously, and decided on the

> A4: "Does not permit non-free licenses for publicly-accessible repos" 

the meaning is essentially the same - its just a matter of
verbosity - i do prefer "publicly-accessible repos" to
"public repos" though

i have made some patches for many of the items on the "recap of
current proposals" thread (including A4)

i am working now to consolidate them into a single patch per
file; because the changes are so closely packed, that it would
make each individual patch difficult to apply separately - i
could post them separately for discussion; though most of the
changes have been thoroughly discussed already

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]