[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rule-list] About RH 8 not supporting 486
From: |
Michael Fratoni |
Subject: |
Re: [Rule-list] About RH 8 not supporting 486 |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:27:18 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 08:35 pm, Martin Stricker wrote:
> > However, just as a test, I think I am going to put together a
> > "slinky" based i386 RULE-linux CD. ;)
>
> Personally, I would like to have a RULE ISO. It could contain some
> other useful stuff (and thus make RULE more known): SGI said they won't
> provide an ISO for Red Hat Linux 8.0, so you can not use XFS
> filesystems at install time, nor for your / directory. The RULE CD
> could fit in here very nicely!
OK, seems to work. I still need to make a few modifications, so I'm not
releasing it just yet. How's this for size:
$ ls -sh slinky-v0.3.1.iso
19M slinky-v0.3.1.iso
It's a bootable ISO which starts the slinky installer, and provides the
i386 kernel package. It also contains the .img files required to make
boot floppies. We run the slinky installer, ask for the Red Hat disks,
and at the end, ask for the slinky disk to install the kernel.
I still need some testers to use the previously released slinky-v0.3.1 and
give me some feedback on the rpm dependencies for everything other than
the base and network options. Please?
- --
- -Michael
pgp key: http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.{2,3} in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9tgkGn/07WoAb/SsRAph8AJ9fdryhTHDPFM65/VNifWUe6qmepACglNHV
IR1XHTe0fdgsG3HlXw7SFV8=
=3OTf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Rule-list] About RH 8 not supporting 486, Marco Fioretti, 2002/10/21
- Re: [Rule-list] About RH 8 not supporting 486, Colin Mattoon, 2002/10/21
- Re: [Rule-list] About RH 8 not supporting 486, Michael Fratoni, 2002/10/22
- Re: [Rule-list] About RH 8 not supporting 486, Glen Lee Edwards, 2002/10/22
- Re: [Rule-list] About RH 8 not supporting 486, Martin Stricker, 2002/10/22
- Re: [Rule-list] About RH 8 not supporting 486, Oisin C. Feeley, 2002/10/22
- Re: [Rule-list] About RH 8 not supporting 486, Martin Stricker, 2002/10/23
- Re: [Rule-list] About RH 8 not supporting 486, Marco Fioretti, 2002/10/24
[Rule-list] Conclusion of:About RH 8 not supporting 486, Marco Fioretti, 2002/10/24