[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486
|
From: |
Marco Fioretti |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:07:05 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 06:42:34 at 06:42:34AM +0100, Marco Fioretti wrote:
> others... simply have no minutes left in the day to split for anything
> else but sleep :-) , not because RH is holy. If *other* people, like
> Liam,
or Colin, of course, which posted many interesting suggestions, or all
others who did the same. What was I saying about lack of sleep? :-)
Ciao,
Marco Fioretti
- Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486, (continued)
- Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486, Liam Proven, 2002/10/28
- Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486, Colin Mattoon, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486, Martin Stricker, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486, Liam Proven, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486, Martin Stricker, 2002/10/30
- Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486, Colin Mattoon, 2002/10/30
- Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486, Marco Fioretti, 2002/10/31
- Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486,
Marco Fioretti <=
- Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486, Martin Stricker, 2002/10/31
- [Rule-list] Not so many rpms need i386, Richard Kweskin, 2002/10/30
- Re: [Rule-list] Not so many rpms need i386, Martin Stricker, 2002/10/30
- Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486, Liam Proven, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486, Marco Fioretti, 2002/10/31
- [Rule-list] "Red Hat" label effect, Richard Kweskin, 2002/10/31
- Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486, Martin Stricker, 2002/10/31
Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486, Glen Lee Edwards, 2002/10/21
Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486, Eugene Wong, 2002/10/29