[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah hacking_sa...
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
[Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah hacking_sa... |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:47:22 -0500 |
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/administration
Module name: administration
Branch:
Changes by: Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden> 04/11/10 19:41:25
Modified files:
docs/hacking_savannah: hacking_savannah.texi
Log message:
Added a note about saying that a project will be approved instead of
saying that it will be reconsidered
CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/administration/administration/docs/hacking_savannah/hacking_savannah.texi.diff?tr1=1.68&tr2=1.69&r1=text&r2=text
Patches:
Index: administration/docs/hacking_savannah/hacking_savannah.texi
diff -u administration/docs/hacking_savannah/hacking_savannah.texi:1.68
administration/docs/hacking_savannah/hacking_savannah.texi:1.69
--- administration/docs/hacking_savannah/hacking_savannah.texi:1.68 Wed Nov
10 00:27:54 2004
+++ administration/docs/hacking_savannah/hacking_savannah.texi Wed Nov 10
19:41:24 2004
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
\input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
address@hidden $Id: hacking_savannah.texi,v 1.68 2004/11/10 00:27:54 Beuc Exp $
address@hidden $Id: hacking_savannah.texi,v 1.69 2004/11/10 19:41:24 Beuc Exp $
@comment %**start of header
@setfilename hacking_savannah.info
@include version.texi
@@ -2513,6 +2513,17 @@
we ask that you send your e-mail reply to one of the 'veteran'
Savannah hackers (via e-mail or IRC), so he can review your review.
+When answering a submission, you may or may not give you thoughts
+about the issue of the approval, like ``Fix this and we will approve
+your project''. This gives the user a better understanding of how long
+the approval will last, maybe give him additional motivation to
+perform the fixes. However it may also put you in a delicate situation
+if you find an issue that you did not find before; this issue will
+postpone or maybe even make the project uneligible for Savannah
+hosting, and would contradict your previous statement. So instead, you
+can say somethink like ``We will reconsider your project for inclusion
+at Savannah''. Up to you :)
+
@node Approval Criteria, GNU projects, The current situation, Projects approval
@section Approval Criteria
- [Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah hacking_sa..., Sylvain Beucler, 2004/11/01
- [Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah hacking_sa..., Sylvain Beucler, 2004/11/01
- [Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah hacking_sa..., Sylvain Beucler, 2004/11/01
- [Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah hacking_sa..., Sylvain Beucler, 2004/11/03
- [Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah hacking_sa..., Sylvain Beucler, 2004/11/09
- [Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah hacking_sa...,
Sylvain Beucler <=
- [Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah hacking_sa..., Sylvain Beucler, 2004/11/10
- [Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah hacking_sa..., Sylvain Beucler, 2004/11/10
- [Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah hacking_sa..., Sylvain Beucler, 2004/11/10
- [Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah hacking_sa..., Sylvain Beucler, 2004/11/11
- [Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah hacking_sa..., Sylvain Beucler, 2004/11/12
- [Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah hacking_sa..., Sylvain Beucler, 2004/11/16
- [Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah hacking_sa..., Sylvain Beucler, 2004/11/17