[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Savannah-hackers] Re: submission of MockBase -

From: Mathieu Roy
Subject: [Savannah-hackers] Re: submission of MockBase -
Date: 22 Jun 2003 19:42:37 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3


I'm evaluating the project you submitted for approval in Savannah.

address@hidden said:

> A package was submitted to
> This mail was sent to address@hidden, address@hidden
> John C Cahill <address@hidden> described the package as follows:
> License: gpl
> Other License: 
> Package: MockBase
> System name: mockbase
> Type: non-GNU
> Description:
> Thesis:
> This is a Java project that focuses on JDBC testing.
> There exists a need to test database oriented code without necessarily
> involving a database.
> Many database oriented software systems are hard to test because the state of 
> the database is often hard to reproduce in a testing environment. Usually, a 
> lot of time is spent writing scripts to put the database into a desired state 
> for testing.
> One solution would be to have a Mock JDBC compliant database server which 
> uses Mock objects. Setup data for the application that is being tested could 
> then be scripted in a non-database oriented manner.
> The project would be to build a Mock database server that would allow use of 
> Mock objects (see, and allow the user of the Mock 
> database server to control data that is returned to the application that is 
> being tested via a scripting mechanism. The Mock database server would also 
> need to process SQL in a meaningful manner.
> I basically view this project as being complimentary to the Mock objects 
> project, but separate in the sense that it "closes the loop" on JDBC testing.

The key question here is to figure out if your project
can run on a Free Software Java suite
(see for more
information).  Could you give us some explanation about
this point?

Please register your project once more with the changes mentioned
above.  The way we handle pending projects makes it difficult to keep
track of projects that have been answered but have not been approved
yet, so we erase them and we ask you to register the project again every
time some change has to be done to the registration, and users might
have to register their projects several times.  Thank you for your

Some users find it useful to use the big re-registration URL provided in
the acknowledgment e-mail you received after registration.


Mathieu Roy
  Not a native english speaker:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]