Re: [Savannah-users] Licensing API documentation generated from AGPL3+-licensed code

[Michał Masłowski]

On 02/07/2011 12:27 AM, Karl Berry wrote:
> To avoid doubling the documentation burden, and yet allowing sharing the
> documentation with other FDL-using manuals (the goal for savannah), I
> recommend dual-licensing under both FDLv1.3+ and AGPLv3+.
> 
> To do this, given that the doc sources are entwined with the source
> code, the easiest way I know of is to make a separate statement in the
> README (or some such) that the documentation parts of the sources are
> licensed under the GFDL.  And the regular GFDL notice should be included
> in the generated documentation.

Thanks for your response, I'll dual-license the documentation parts.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature