[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:39:35 -0700 |
keep both options to choose (dual GFDL+CC-BY-SA).
Dual licensing is fine. Thanks.
the entire repository with all previous history of commits (some of
which turned out to be inconsistent with the policies) to Savannah after
adjusting the current commits to the requirements?
I don't know. I don't recall a precedent either way.
The examples of the config files are another concern
The simplest thing for examples might be to simply label them "public
domain". Then they are compatible with everything and anyone can use
them as desired, without worrying about the requirements of the GFDL or
CC-BY-SA. Which is usually what's actually desired for examples. --best, karl.
- Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project, Anton S. Lytvynenko, 2020/02/27
- Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project, Karl Berry, 2020/02/27
- Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project, Ian Kelling, 2020/02/27
- Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project, Karl Berry, 2020/02/27
- Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project, Ineiev, 2020/02/28
- Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project, Ineiev, 2020/02/28
- Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project, Anton S. Lytvynenko, 2020/02/28
- Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project, Ineiev, 2020/02/29