[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project
From: |
Ineiev |
Subject: |
Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Feb 2020 15:07:12 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 04:39:35PM -0700, Karl Berry wrote:
>
> the entire repository with all previous history of commits (some of
> which turned out to be inconsistent with the policies) to Savannah after
> adjusting the current commits to the requirements?
>
> I don't know. I don't recall a precedent either way.
TTBOMK the current practice is to keep the latest revisions
compliant; it would be too much to require rewriting the history.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project, Anton S. Lytvynenko, 2020/02/27
- Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project, Karl Berry, 2020/02/27
- Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project, Ian Kelling, 2020/02/27
- Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project, Karl Berry, 2020/02/27
- Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project, Ineiev, 2020/02/28
- Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project, Ineiev, 2020/02/28
- Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project, Anton S. Lytvynenko, 2020/02/28
- Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project, Karl Berry, 2020/02/28
- Re: Eligibility of CC-BY-SA for documentation within a software project,
Ineiev <=