social-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Social-discuss] PHP-Based GNU Social structure


From: Ted Smith
Subject: Re: [Social-discuss] PHP-Based GNU Social structure
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:50:58 -0400

On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 18:56 +0200, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> Why cant we do both and have the best of both worlds?  I dont think
>   there's anyone that's said, 'hey lets NOT do a desktop client', just
>  that with limited resources the core project team wants to focus first
>  on a GLAMP solution.  What's to stop you adding a blazingly fast
>   native client in parallel? 

We can do that. It would be definitely sub-optimal, because we'd
essentially have a fork (two implementations of the core, at least). We
would need a strictly and consensually defined protocol for core/UI
communication. 

The contention here isn't the UI. Everyone agrees that a web UI would be
nice, as would a desktop-based UI. People disagree on the implementation
of the core as a GLAMP application versus a conventional daemon. But if
we accept the duplicated effort, there's no reason not to have both.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]