[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spamass-milter terminated with signal 6
From: |
Valentin Chopov |
Subject: |
Re: spamass-milter terminated with signal 6 |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:05:54 -0400 (EDT) |
FYI,
It happened again about 10 times last night but compare with the previous
night (~30) it's more stable;)
Now I disabled compiler optimizations and removed -march=pentium4
and wait...
Val
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Valentin Chopov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's running smooth for ~2h already.
> I installed gcc33 and compiled the spamass-milter with it and "-static"
> (and even with -march=pentium4 ;)
>
> Thank you very much for the help,
>
> Val
>
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Dan Nelson wrote:
>
> > In the last episode (Jun 03), Mike Tancsa said:
> > > If you compile and link a static version of the milter on 5.x and run
> > > it on 4.x does it work ?
> >
> > The binary probably wouldn't run at all, since it'd be linked with a
> > 5.0 libc that expects 5.0 kernel syscalls. Note that 5.0 uses gcc 3.2,
> > so it's more likely the compiler update is what "fixed" the problem.
> >
> > --
> > Dan Nelson
> > address@hidden
> >
==
Valentin S. Chopov, CC[ND]P
Sys/Net Admin
SEI Data Inc.
E-Mail: address@hidden
==
- Re: spamass-milter terminated with signal 6, (continued)
- Re: spamass-milter terminated with signal 6, Mike Tancsa, 2003/06/02
- Re: spamass-milter terminated with signal 6, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/02
- Re: spamass-milter terminated with signal 6, Valentin Chopov, 2003/06/03
- Re: spamass-milter terminated with signal 6, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/03
- Re: spamass-milter terminated with signal 6, Mike Tancsa, 2003/06/03
- Re: spamass-milter terminated with signal 6, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/03
- Re: spamass-milter terminated with signal 6, Mike Tancsa, 2003/06/03
- Re: spamass-milter terminated with signal 6, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/03
- Re: spamass-milter terminated with signal 6, Valentin Chopov, 2003/06/03
- Re: spamass-milter terminated with signal 6,
Valentin Chopov <=