[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"You do not have the required role" on Google app login. Another Google
"You do not have the required role" on Google app login. Another Google app bug?
Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:45:24 +0400
When I login to google app. I see "You do not have the required role."
Any particular reason about this. Or is it another Google app bug?
2009/4/15 Kirill Kononenko <address@hidden>:
>>>>> Note though that this scoring down/unassigning *has* to be done by the
>>>>> organisation who gives the student up. The student can't make the
>>>>> selection himself. The student can be included in the discussion, but
>>>>> ultimately the yielding organisation has to make sure he is no longer
>>>>> among the top-ranked proposals, or the conflict won't be resolved. The
>>>>> duplicate resolution meeting is the very latest occasion to do this --
>>>>> but if the situation is clear beforehand, it should be done earlier.
>>>> The above rather sounds like it is up to us to decide whether to keep
>>>> the student - whether or not he has indicated preference for another
>>>> project. It is true that the action to take in reducing the ranking is
>>>> ours, and not the students: however, it has been made quite clear that
>>>> the student _must_ (not "should") be consulted, and that if they make a
>>>> choice we are expected to comply. If, as Klaus had indicated (off-list),
>>>> and also NetBSD has indicated on the mentors list, Matthias-Chris has
>>>> opted for NetBSD, it is inappropriate for us to keep him in our top
>>>> rankings. We need to hear _now_ if the situation is other than as it has
>>>> been represented to be, otherwise he should be immediately ranked below
>>>> the top eight.
>>> I am sorry but not everyone lives in the American timing zone. So to
>>> "hear _now_ is too strong."
>> It cannot possibly be too strong. Now means "now". As in, the absolute,
>> final resolution meeting takes place in (at this point) a matter of hours.
>>> I think the only reason I see to reject
>>> Matthias-Christian is:
>> Matthias-Christian was not rejected, he explicitly chose to go another
>> direction, as I've said more than once already. There really should not
>> be further discussion past that: as I pointed out before, the person to
>> take it up with is _him_. Until the situation changes (and I submit that
>> it's too late at this point to be trying to change this), we _must_
>> remove him from our slots (and this has in fact been done).
> Okay. No problem with me about Matthias-Christian. I think our group
> is not really found to work with Matthias-Christian anyways. I am
> personally not found to work with this again anymore. The guy is only
> an opportunist who is afraid of doing a real work. Even if we take
> him, he will not work with us later, because he is only doing this for
> money and even very little money. I see no sense of our group to
> invest our precious time in him.
|[Prev in Thread]
||[Next in Thread]|
- "You do not have the required role" on Google app login. Another Google app bug?,
Kirill Kononenko <=