[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] {under,over}brace work
From: |
Joris van der Hoeven |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] {under,over}brace work |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Apr 2003 11:44:14 +0200 (CEST) |
> I'm trying to do some preliminary work on those. As part of that, I
> need symbols from the following fonts:
>
> cmex:
> 122 - braceld
> 123 - bracerd
> 124 - bracelu
> 125 - braceru
>
> txexa:
> 32 - bracext
>
> I have tried adding
>
> 122 "braceld" "bracerd" "bracelu" "braceru"
>
> to rubber-cmex.enc, but it doesn't seem to have an effect. How do I add
> these symbols ?
This certainly does have an effect. In math-mode you will
be able to get them using C-q.
However, making wide under/overbraces work will require
one or two days of work. The best thing to do is to take
a look at how large delimiters are dealt with in the C++ code.
Be careful though that there is no automatic TeX-font information
about wide composite symbols (as there is for the large delimiters).
You should also pay attention to the tricks to get
the anti-aliasing right.
- [Texmacs-dev] {under,over}brace work, Nix N. Nix, 2003/04/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] {under,over}brace work,
Joris van der Hoeven <=
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] {under,over}brace work, Nix N. Nix, 2003/04/16
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] {under,over}brace work, david, 2003/04/16
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] {under,over}brace work, Joris van der Hoeven, 2003/04/16
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] {under,over}brace work, Nix N. Nix, 2003/04/17
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] {under,over}brace work, Joris van der Hoeven, 2003/04/18