[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Texmacs-dev] A \udots suggestion

From: Joris van der Hoeven
Subject: Re: [Texmacs-dev] A \udots suggestion
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 15:57:23 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:48:03PM -0700, address@hidden wrote:
> TeXmacs defines \udots in exported latex by:
> \newcommand{\udots}{{\mbox{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{$\ddots$}}}}
> It seems unnecessary to do this. For example xdvi complains
> that rotation is not supported, and the rotated dots are not
> displayed correctly.
> Why not just imitate the plain tex definition of ddots:
> \newcommand{\udots}{\mathinner{\mskip1mu\raise1pt\vbox{\kern7pt\hbox{.}}
>   \mskip2mu\raise4pt\hbox{.}\mskip2mu\raise7pt\hbox{.}\mskip1mu}}
> This works perfectly well and saves loading graphicx.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]