Re: [Texmacs-dev] TeXmacs' future

[Joris van der Hoeven]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:09:48AM +0000, Felix Breuer wrote:
> In the light of the literate programming discussion: Is it possible to
> define a D.R.D. that says "the contents of this tag are supposed to be
> serialized verbatim when using the literate serialization mechanism"?

Yes, that would be a typical DRD property.

> > > 2) scripting language independence
> > > 
> > > I think something was mentioned about making it possible to script
> > > TeXmacs with other languages than scheme. What became of this?
> > 
> > At the moment, I have no time for this. I would already be happy to
> > have a decent and well document interface in Scheme. I also more and
> > more believe that Scheme is a great scripting language for TeXmacs.
> 
> I can live with Scheme. I was just asking out of interest.
> 
> More important than a different language would be a more complete
> documentation of the TeXmacs API, but I can understand that this is
> a lot of work. 

Yes, especially because the API itself has to be made more robust
during the documentation process (documenting things is a good way
to discover things which should be improved).