tunnel-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[tunnel-list] gasp


From: Joan Snyder
Subject: [tunnel-list] gasp
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:11:59 +0400
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)


Recent customer wins include BroadStar Communications and Norlight . I hear you say, the fact that SCO has been unwilling or unable to be specific.
Another secret in SCO's mountain of secret offenses for which they would like IBM to pay them billions.
no, wait, they didn't say that. Yes, they might have distributed under the GPL, but that was other people's code and they didn't know. Novell is trying to win. And leaving specific code out of this, they never noticed file systems in Linux, for example, were quite a lot like Unix? He now works for SUSE. She didn't even know what pretexting was. And that is a secondary purpose of filing summary judgment motions. It's more than twenty, because there are proposed orders too. We must prepare ourselves for the demise of those claims.
Or more time to respond to Novell's discovery requests.
If that were true, then how come they didn't at least know about the methods and concepts being in there? In other words, it is asking the court to throw out SCO's entire case, and to grant it judgment on two counterclaims without even going to trial on those two. If they were in charge, as Mark Hurd acknowledges the CEO ultimately is, then they were not paying attention. I hear you say, the fact that SCO has been unwilling or unable to be specific. Flaxa was Director of Caldera's Linux development team back when.
There's no legal notice that this is only for SCO customers or any nonsense like that.
He agreed I could, so here's his explanation, which I'm sure will help you to understand that win or lose, IBM comes out ahead. But I'll let him explain.
It's more than twenty, because there are proposed orders too.
The buck stops nowhere.
And the public is interested too. They lost sight of the values that HP has always represented. The end came to justify the means. And I can't write anything about what IBM has allegedly done, because SCO won't tell us.
But this will get you started while I slave away.
Yes, they might have distributed under the GPL, but that was other people's code and they didn't know.
She didn't even know what pretexting was.
Man pages are included of course. For example, IPX was contributed to Linux by SCO. I'll show you the Pacer text, and I'll get the filings up as soon as I can. SCO knew what was in there with specificity, he testifies, and released under the GPL knowingly.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]