[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hebrew patches...
From: |
the duke |
Subject: |
Re: Hebrew patches... |
Date: |
Mon, 19 May 2003 16:09:28 -0500 |
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Marcus Brinkmann <address@hidden>
>> Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 22:43:52 +0200
>> To: the duke <address@hidden>
>> Subject: Re: Hebrew patches...
.
.
.
>
> UTF-8 is certainly desirable. If UTF-8 support is mature enough on all
> systems that will be used to display hebrew web pages is a matter you can
> judge best by your experience with using hebrew web pages and by the
> feedback from the hebrew-browsing community.
>
seems to be mature enough. or at least as mature as the competing standards.
Only this one has the advantage of slowly becoming even more mature :)
> It's your decision, just as the actual content is your decision. However,
> if there is not a real need to use two different encodings for two different
> files, it would be good to have all hebrew files in the same format.
>
Agreed. The two different encodings were my mistake. And as I noted on my
answer to Alfred, all documents were converted to UTF-8.
Thanx for noting it anyway.
salut!
the duke
--
_______________________________________________
Get your free email from http://mail.usa.com
- Re: Hebrew patches..., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/05/09
- Re: Hebrew patches..., the duke, 2003/05/15
- Re: Hebrew patches..., the duke, 2003/05/17
- Re: Hebrew patches..., the duke, 2003/05/18
- Re: Hebrew patches...,
the duke <=
- Re: Hebrew patches..., the duke, 2003/05/19
- Re: Hebrew patches..., the duke, 2003/05/21
- Re: Hebrew patches..., the duke, 2003/05/21
- Re: Hebrew patches..., the duke, 2003/05/22
- Re: Hebrew patches..., the duke, 2003/05/23