|
From: | Rex Dieter |
Subject: | Re: [XForms] xforms on epel - no doc rpm |
Date: | Thu, 28 May 2015 10:45:06 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
On 05/27/2015 01:20 PM, Jens Thoms Toerring wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:11:17PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:On 05/26/2015 02:31 PM, Jens Thoms Toerring wrote:Hi Rex, On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 02:00:39PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:On 05/26/2015 12:25 PM, Frank Cox wrote:I notice that the xforms rpms on epel are xforms and xforms-devel. The xforms-doc rpm (with all of the example code and whatnot) is not there.Neither fedora (or epel) ever shipped a xforms-doc pkg as far as I'm aware. Is this an implicit request that it should? If so, what content should it contain exactly? Stuff from demos/ ?No, the demo programs aren't the documentation,OK, I won't include demos/ (even though the embedded xforms.spec in the tarball does exactly that).What I meant is that the "demos" aren't the whole documenation, but they should definitely be considered as part of the docu- mentation.
Ah, ok, epel updates that include a -doc subpkg submitted, https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xforms-1.2.4-5.el7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xforms-1.2.4-5.el6 should get pushed out to -testing repos within a day or 2. -- rex
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |