[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Changes in font locking

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Changes in font locking
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:17:57 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup quotes Artemio Gonzalez:
>  > > That's due to a bug in XEmacs 21.5 related to the function
>  > > `with-syntax-table' I reported over two years ago to the XEmacs
> The syntax table stuff is unlikely to get fixed by XEmacs core
> developers until Ben returns, because it hooks into various processes
> at a rather low level.  If somebody wants to invest in studying that
> stuff and produce a patch, I'd be happy to review.
>  > So Artemio, you might want to add your voice to this problem getting
>  > fixed.
> Inciting to riot should be beneath you, David.  But be my guest: I
> have plenty of nagging voices in my head, but I've learned to ignore
> them.  I can ignore one more.

Quite funny.  Too bad that it is also quite sad.  You tell me when
reporting bugs affecting AUCTeX users that there is no priority to fix
them because nobody else complains about them.  When I tell others to
complain to you instead of to us, you accuse me of "inciting to riot"
and declare that you can ignore reports regardless of their number.

Is this supposed to be 忠義 or 悌?

> That's true of everybody.  XEmacs is a user-supported project;
> things get fixed when people contribute fixes.  All you contribute,
> though, is abuse.  More abuse?  No, thank you.

I asked Artemio to report his problem, possibly including a screen
shot for illustration.  You consider bug reports abuse, before you
even see them?

That certainly explains a _lot_ about your past replies to them.  And
I thought it was just my unique talent of phrasing them.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]