[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?
From: |
Ralf Angeli |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release? |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:25:44 +0100 |
* Tassilo Horn (2012-11-10) writes:
> Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> As I've mentioned before, I can do the release as well. But I haven't
>> had time to thoroughly look at the Biber patch which I wanted to do
>> before we make a release. Has somebody else inspected it?
>
> No, I don't use Biber (yet). But at least it doesn't seem to break
> existing functionality.
>
> In my opinion, the current 11.86 release has so many known issues like
> preview not working with recent emacsen that it has no value in holding
> back a new release, but simply release more often when bugs get reported
> and fixed.
I'll try to look at the problem with the defcustoms this weekend.
Perhaps I also have time to look at other parts of the patch. For
example, if `LaTeX-always-use-biber' makes sense or if we should enable
something automatically in a biblatex style file. Also, if we need some
more documentation for this stuff.
--
Ralf
- [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, David Kastrup, 2012/11/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/10
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?,
Ralf Angeli <=
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/28
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/28
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/29
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/30
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Uwe Brauer, 2012/11/30
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/30
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/30