[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AUCTeX and in-buffer completion
From: |
Ikumi Keita |
Subject: |
Re: AUCTeX and in-buffer completion |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:42:18 +0900 |
Hi Arash,
>>>>> Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org> writes:
> AUCTeX is known to do minibuffer query and completion when adding new
> macros or environments incl. arguments. One thing missing is when one
> wants to add/change keyval or other elements to existing constructs in
> the buffer -- there is no in-buffer completion.
> There is also a git branch feature/capf with the latest version.
> Is it worth to integrate this into AUCTeX? It will need some effort to
> adjust latex.el and the styles we have in order to make them work with
> the ideas here, so the question is, if this is a needed feature?
I tried the latest feature/capf branch for a while and it basically
works well. I think it's worth integrating into AUCTeX.
I'm aware of two issues currently.
1. It throws the following notifications repeatedly in the echo area
after I typed a character after parentheses like "()":
Company: An error occurred in auto-begin
Company: backend company-capf error "Scan error: "Unbalanced parentheses",
7426, 6790" with args (prefix)
2. It throws the following error after something like "\sqrt[3]". It
seems that it doesn't like string literal inside "[]" for TeX symbol
specifications.
Company: An error occurred in auto-begin
Company: backend company-capf error "Wrong type argument: symbolp, "Root"" with
args (prefix)
I hope these reports are helpful for you.
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
- AUCTeX and in-buffer completion, Arash Esbati, 2022/10/14
- Re: AUCTeX and in-buffer completion, Uwe Brauer, 2022/10/14
- Re: AUCTeX and in-buffer completion, Arash Esbati, 2022/10/14
- Re: AUCTeX and in-buffer completion, Uwe Brauer, 2022/10/14
- Re: AUCTeX and in-buffer completion, Arash Esbati, 2022/10/14
- Re: AUCTeX and in-buffer completion, Uwe Brauer, 2022/10/14
- Re: AUCTeX and in-buffer completion, Arash Esbati, 2022/10/14
- Re: AUCTeX and in-buffer completion, Uwe Brauer, 2022/10/14
- Re: AUCTeX and in-buffer completion, Uwe Brauer, 2022/10/14
Re: AUCTeX and in-buffer completion,
Ikumi Keita <=