[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: basename sucks
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: basename sucks |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Feb 2007 22:47:42 +0100 (CET) |
> Furthermore, with a --suffix option, we could also allow multiple
> command line arguments, another usage case that might prove
> useful:
>
> $ basename --suffix=.h foo.h bar.h
It's always fun until somebody puts out an eye by having a file named
"--suffix=.h".
Handle it the same way everything handles it: basename -- --suffix=.h
Regarding the original query, why not just use awk?
You have touched a nerve... :-) From the top of my head:
cat -- sed ':'
tac -- sed '1!G;h;$!d'
grep -- sed 'PATTERN/!d'
head -- sed '10q'
tail -- sed -e ':a' -e '$q;N;11,$D;ba'
dirname -- sed 's;[^/]*$;;'
basename -- sed 's;.*/;;'
cp OLD NEW -- sed 'w NEW' OLD
One can always just use something else, but most often the something
else is painful.
- basename sucks, dusan halicky, 2007/02/01
- Re: basename sucks, Eric Blake, 2007/02/01
- Re: basename sucks, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/02/01
- Re: basename sucks, Eric Blake, 2007/02/01
- Re: basename sucks, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/02/01
- Re: basename sucks, Evan Hunt, 2007/02/01
- Re: basename sucks, Matthew Woehlke, 2007/02/01
- Re: basename sucks,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: basename sucks, Mike Frysinger, 2007/02/01
- Re: basename sucks, Bob Proulx, 2007/02/01
- Re: basename sucks, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/02/02
- Re: basename sucks, Bob Proulx, 2007/02/02
- Re: basename sucks, Matthew Woehlke, 2007/02/02
- Re: basename sucks, Mike Frysinger, 2007/02/02
- Re: basename sucks, Matthew Woehlke, 2007/02/02
- Re: basename sucks, Andreas Schwab, 2007/02/02
- Re: basename sucks, Mike Frysinger, 2007/02/02
- Re: basename sucks, Andreas Schwab, 2007/02/02