[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9185: 24.0.50; "C-s M-p" does not bring the tip of the search ring
From: |
Dani Moncayo |
Subject: |
bug#9185: 24.0.50; "C-s M-p" does not bring the tip of the search ring |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:32:01 +0200 |
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 13:13, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I understand what you say, but IMO, clearly the advantages of the
>> current behavior (save one extra M-p) in no way makes up for the
>> drawbacks (counter intuitive behavior; no way to check the tip of the
>> search ring before using it).
>
> You can still type C-s M-p M-n to get the first entry for inspection.
> It's a trade-off which is more important.
>
Indeed. (I realized it just after posting).
So what do people think it would be more convenient?
Isn't the requested behavior of M-p more intuitive?
Isn't it more consistent with the behavior of M-p in other contexts?
Isn't "M-p M-p" almost as quick to type than a single "M-p"?
...
--
Dani Moncayo
- bug#9185: 24.0.50; "C-s M-p" does not bring the tip of the search ring, (continued)
- bug#9185: 24.0.50; "C-s M-p" does not bring the tip of the search ring, Dani Moncayo, 2011/07/28
- bug#9185: 24.0.50; "C-s M-p" does not bring the tip of the search ring, Deniz Dogan, 2011/07/28
- bug#9185: 24.0.50; "C-s M-p" does not bring the tip of the search ring, Dani Moncayo, 2011/07/28
- bug#9185: 24.0.50; "C-s M-p" does not bring the tip of the search ring, Deniz Dogan, 2011/07/28
- bug#9185: 24.0.50; "C-s M-p" does not bring the tip of the search ring, Dani Moncayo, 2011/07/28
- bug#9185: 24.0.50; "C-s M-p" does not bring the tip of the search ring, Andreas Schwab, 2011/07/28
bug#9185: 24.0.50; "C-s M-p" does not bring the tip of the search ring, Juri Linkov, 2011/07/28